It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I tend to do a full review rather than a blind review because I hate using test time to figure out whether I am convinced of my answer or not.
I know it's more time-taking when you're reviewing questions, but do you think it has similar benefits to blind review?
Comments
The only downside is that you don't catch overconfidence/underconfidence issues.
Just circle the answers you're not 100% on, then match them to the BR copy. That should give you a good estimate of the accuracy of your confidence. I write a 1-5 next to each question. 1=0 confidence, 5=90-99% confidence. A circle is 100% confidence, I mean so sure of my answer that I would bet my life on it.
However, this does require you to br with a clean test copy. I like to buy 2 of each single test in order to most simulate the actual test day. I hate the large 10 actual books.
I also do a 100% full review of each pt I take.
Interesting. Thanks for the response.