Frequency of Revisiting the Core Curriculum and Prioritization of Weakness

Rosenkranz

Hey all. I just finished the core curriculum and have jumped back into timed PT's. The analytics on this site are great and I have identified one major LR weakness and two minor ones. I plan on setting aside at least one day in the near future to make my first attack.

How often do you, fellow 7Sagers, break from PT's post-core curriculum to fine tune your understanding of your weaknesses in the core curriculum? After every three tests or after every five? What is your drilling strategy after that? 20 3 of 5 difficulties, followed by 20 4 of 5's, followed by 20 5 of 5's of that type, for example?

LSAT_Wrecker

If there is an area of weakness identified by a PT, I would re-mediate that area of weakness before taking additional PTs. If not, then I would expect subsequent PTs to continue to point out that area. In my mind, the LSAT talks to me in a smug voice and says, "Hey idiot, I told you last time you were weak in this area. Why do you think an additional PT would say anything different? I think Einstein said something about doing the same thing the same way..."

Good luck!

MissChanandler

Yeah, at least drill weaknesses after every PT

Rosenkranz

It seems like common sense. I guess I needed someone to say it aloud. I can be common sense deficient sometimes!

I appreciate the replies.

I was quite high in missed Flaw/Descriptive problems and of secondary concern were SA and Weaken. I have since done some drilling in all areas and will get back to some timed sections tomorrow.

Thanks again.

Sprinkles

@LSAT_Wrecker said:

"Hey idiot, I told you last time you were weak in this area. Why do you think an additional PT would say anything different? I think Einstein said something about doing the same thing the same way..."

Umm...I petition for this to pop up after scoring a PT that has common question type/game types incorrect