Just Read It?

vanessapintea

Hi there, Does anyone find that it is more difficult to determine whether or not an argument is valid using the 'lawgic' method than it is to simply read the question?

devin.balut

That's still using logic, just internal logic. If a statement is complicated enough it can help to write with propositional logic to clarify what argument is actually being made. That said, calling the logic taught in lsat courses as lawgic, or implying it's some lsat-specific nonsense serves you badly.

If you're getting the right answers without writing it out, it's just because you're reaching the right conclusion using the same understanding of arguments. Unless you're doing better than -3 a section it would probably help to learn it.