Hi everyone!
I was just wondering if you could provide some insight as to which is better....doing older prep tests I haven't done yet (38-45ish) or focusing on the newer 15 or so tests that I have done untimed a couple of months ago. I'm retaking the LSAT otherwise I would have left the newer tests untouched. The advice I've gotten is to focus on 2007 and above because that's when the comparative reading comp was introduced and as the a whole the tests are better representative of what you'll actually get.
Comments
I hope you find this helpful. I just don't want you to be thrown when you take the actual LSAT, since it is markedly different (not just the comparative RC) than the tests even from the 40s. These are still valuable tests, but less valuable even than redoing 52+, especially if it has been a month or more that you have looked at the newer tests.