Hey!
I just wanted to share with you all this deal I came across on Ebay. I actually paid $11 to get the print edition of The Economist for a full year! If that's not a deal then I don't know what is! lol But since I don't like reading stuff through my screen I looked into getting a subscription and this was totally worth it. I feel that I spend more $ on printing 4-5 articles daily. So I gave in and in all honesty I think that this has helped my RC score. Also I am more aware of what's going on in the world. Which is important for all of us especially since we all want to practice law one day. It's like I'm so used to reading a couple of articles throughout the day that when I don't I feel like I'm missing something. And I'm sure when I'm done with the LSAT I will still find pleasure in reading these weekly articles. So if anyone else has been looking for a cheap subscription to purchase I have posted the Ebay link below.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/331409917512?_trksid=p2060778.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
Comments
I follow them on Twitter so whenever they posted an interesting article I would favorite it and when I was in the office at work or at home I would print it and add it to my stack of articles I needed to read. I would right-click and print it out. Then I would open an Incognito window and print another two. LOL but then I found out I could access any of their articles through the public library ^_^
Thank you!
Emli1000: Reading The Economist is beneficial for LSAT prep. Since reading The Economist, my average RC score has improved significantly, and it is easier to focus on long passages.
Noticevish: One should not read The Economist for RC practice, as they are sufficiently different enough that replacing reading actual LSAT questions with The Economist is not an effective strategy. Reading The Economist is neither necessary nor sufficient for doing well on the LSAT.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens Noticevish's argument?
(A) Many 7Sagers read The Economist, and most 7Sagers are likely to do well on the LSAT.
(B) Both harrismegan and mpits001 are interested in subscribing to The Economist.
(C) There are other more difficult journals that one can read for practice.
(D)...
Ok guys, won't lie, ran out of steam there.
The Economist is an excellent news magazine even if you don't believe in liberal economics (which this publication is a strong advocate of). The opinion pieces are generally well reasoned, and the articles are very well written. In fact, I recall one my first year college English professors telling students to read the Economists just because it's good writing.
But it's for this reason that, at least for people who don't have any major problems with RC, that I don't recommend the Economist for. I agree with Noticevish. The Economist is too well written because it's meant to get a message across and make you believe in it. The LSAT is not "well written" because it's meant to mess with your head and test your reading and reasoning abilities. I doubt any English professor would consider LSAT passages well written outside of the exam.
Regardless, I don't mind subscribing to the Economist even though I'm not too sure if it's as useful to the LSAT as I've been reading. It is a good news magazine, and I have learned more about current events around the world that I would from more mainstream news sources. That's good enough for me.
I rather pay $11 once for 51 issues