Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

PT1 S3 Q09 Fines levied against environmental accidents

chellevangchellevang Member
edited August 2020 in Logical Reasoning 136 karma

Can someone explain why answer choice D would not weaken this argument? Is it because it directly attacks the premise stated that businesses value their profits? Is saying they treat the "fines" as a business expense essentially saying they do not value their profit because they are not remedying the problem? #help

Comments

  • SSBM1000SSBM1000 Member
    edited August 2020 614 karma

    Hello,

    D is incorrect because it's ultimately irrelevant to the argument. Whether or not a company treats fines as an ordinary business expense doesn't change the fact that the company is still paying more in those fines than they would for the cost of the safeguards, so it doesn't weaken the argument since it doesn't give us a reason to think that the companies possibly won't install these safeguards despite the high cost of the fines. Also, for all we know these companies might consider the cost of installing the safeguards to be a business expense as well.

  • chellevangchellevang Member
    136 karma

    Makes sense. Thank you for taking the time to explain!!

Sign In or Register to comment.