Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

how to diagram "whatever"

Rev_LefeRev_Lefe Member

Hi,
I've seen "whatever" in many questions. For example:

i) "The meaning of a poem is whatever the author intends to communicate to the reader by means of the poem."
(PT57.S2.Q24)

ii) "The meaning of a poem is whatever meaning a reader assigns to it"
(PT55.S3.Q24)

My intuition is to make both sentence biconditional, without any strong logic reason.

I checked some grammar books, one mentions it's a relative and conditional determiner. It seems to also suggest that both of the sentences are bi-condiitonal.

So I want to know how you think about this. Any insights and comments would be really appreciated.
Thanks.

Comments

  • Jordan JohnsonJordan Johnson Member
    686 karma

    Those examples both seem like definitions, so I wouldn't use conditional notation on either of them (they're both saying 'A is B'... I don't see the term 'whatever' as a logical indicator).

    I suppose a bi-conditional would make the most sense since a term and its definition should be interchangeable, but I've never considered notating them in that way.

  • LivinLaVidaLSATLivinLaVidaLSAT Alum Member
    694 karma

    Whenever I'm not sure about the logic or how to interpret it, I ask myself, "What traditional logic indicator words could I use instead of 'whatever'?" Consider synonyms (keep the part of speech in mind). Then see if I can translate it to an if/then statement.

    For the biconditional, simplify it, and consider each conditional statement separately. I remind myself that the biconditional means A triggers B and B triggers A. Ask yourself if each statement is true.

    A ---> B
    A <--- B

    Therefore, A <---> B.

    I'm curious, how you would diagram the 2 sentences as written? What's the biconditional and how does "whatever" come into play?

  • Rev_LefeRev_Lefe Member
    385 karma

    Thank you, Jordan Johnson and LivinLaVidaLSAT.
    "Bi-conditional" mean a condition is both sufficient and necessary for another condition, which is precisely what your diagram "A <---> B" presents.
    I am really not sure how whatever plays in me putting these two sentence into biconditional; perhaps I am tempted to do so due to the nature of relative and conditional determiner.

Sign In or Register to comment.