PT11.S2.Q21 - A recent report on environmental improvement program...

BlueRiceCake

Why would the program care about if they have "serious problems" when they said they needed to focus on building competence just to stay on air. B sounds too vague to me

elevator_music

We are told that the report's authors concede that yes, the critique is valid and that ultimately they should focus on creating a coherent vision. But we're also told that for them to be functional they need government funding and in order to procure it they need to regain their reputation first. B is correct because it points out a weakness in the program organization---how could the program regain the reputation for competence through pragmatic solutions when the reason their problems exist in the first place is due to a lack of a coherent vision? What B is saying is that there is another route to gaining the reputation of competence which is through a coherent vision and not pragmatic solutions.