PT11.S2.Q21 - A recent report on environmental improvement program...

Comments

• elevator_music Core Member

  July 2021 151 karma

  We are told that the report's authors concede that yes, the critique is valid and that ultimately they should focus on creating a coherent vision. But we're also told that for them to be functional they need government funding and in order to procure it they need to regain their reputation first. B is correct because it points out a weakness in the program organization---how could the program regain the reputation for competence through pragmatic solutions when the reason their problems exist in the first place is due to a lack of a coherent vision? What B is saying is that there is another route to gaining the reputation of competence which is through a coherent vision and not pragmatic solutions.