It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Hi guys. I've heard it's best to annotate the least amount as possible on RC to account for time and accuracy on answers. I was wondering, what are your strategies and methods towards annotating for the RC passages. Do you highlight specific things like author's tone or change in language, etc? I would love to know to try out new ways of annotating on the digital test to see what works best.
Comments
I tried a bunch of annotation techniques and found highlighting to be the best for me. I typically highlight important info, unique words, etc in one color, other people's opinions in another, and author's opinion/tone in a third. It keeps me engaged, helps me to find key words/important references, and breaks up the passage. I will warn that any new annotation strategy will slow you down, at first. It takes time to fold it into your routine, so maybe try various things, one at a time, on untimed sections to see what works for you, then adapt as needed for time as you get more comfortable.
Yes, this helps a lot. I think I would benefit from highlighting, I normally underline mostly, but I recently have tried highlighting and that helps things stick more for me. I feel like people have said that it's not a good idea to do a lot of annotations because it takes away from timing. Maybe I will practice selective highlighting. I really appreciate your comment!
You can use highlights as a learning tool at the moment, untimed. Timed: if you -3 or better, you can highlight. But if you worst then that highlighting is an additional obstacle.