Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Categories

Aug 2022 Crystal Ball Predictions

kimia7841kimia7841 Core Member
edited August 2022 in August 2022 LSAT 41 karma

Update: This is what was shared with me

Suggested RC: PT 68 P3, 74 P4, 80 P1, 82 P3, 83 P4, 87 P4, 61 P3, 67 P3, 82 P3, 40 P3, 50 P4, 77 P4, 85 P2, 86 P4, 67 P4, 81 P2M 85 P1, 87 P3.

Suggest LR: PT 83, 81, 78, 89, 86, 85 (Most important) , 70 (Hardest LR)

Suggested LG:
a. Grouping: PT 28 G3, 39 G2, 48 G3, 81 G4, 83 G1 + 3
b. Circular: PT 41 G4
c. Mapping: PT 79 G4
d. Pattern: PT 72 G4, 80 G4
e. Grouping/Linear Combo: PT 64 G4, 82 G3
f. Basic Linear: PT 78 G3, 82 G2, 86 G3
g. Advanced Linear: PT 37 G1 + 4, 76 G3, 83 G4, 87 G3
h. For Seq Elements: PT 75 G3, 84 G1

Suggested Full-Test Practice Tests: PT 89, 90, 91, 92

Hope this helps :)

Show Related Discussions
«1

Comments

  • alyssamadelynalyssamadelyn Member
    89 karma

    I'll message you!

  • rachnelirachneli Member
    140 karma

    Could you message me as well please? Can't believe I missed it!

  • Legally Brunette-1Legally Brunette-1 Member
    67 karma

    @alyssamadelyn if you could please message me as well, I would really appreciate it!!

  • chiwala4dadchiwala4dad Member
    24 karma

    @alyssamadelyn i'd appreciate a message as well !!! TY

  • Vijaykumardarshan50Vijaykumardarshan50 Member
    3 karma

    @alyssamadelyn Could you message me as well! It would help me out a lot!

  • SageStudent-1SageStudent-1 Member
    6 karma

    Please help message me as well! @alyssamadelyn

  • eimack427eimack427 Core Member
    3 karma

    @alyssamadelyn can you message me as well please? Thanks!!

  • KbrookssKbrookss Member
    edited July 2022 106 karma

    @alyssamadelyn said:
    I'll message you!

    Could you message me as well I missed it too. @alyssamadelyn

  • BossTitanBossTitan Core Member
    14 karma

    @alyssamadelyn could you also message me as well when you get time please?

  • BrooklynBrooklyn Member
    8 karma

    Hi would you mind messaging me too please? @alyssamadelyn

  • eqbalneha24eqbalneha24 Member
    8 karma

    Hi Can you message me too please? @alyssamadelyn

  • living4lifeliving4life Core Member
    29 karma

    I also attended and can message anyone! DM me

  • KbrookssKbrookss Member
    edited July 2022 106 karma

    @tallone1234 said:
    I also attended and can message anyone! DM me

    Can you message me please, thank you in advance @tallone1234

  • krystinkrystin Member
    edited July 2022 85 karma

    @tallone1234 or @alyssamadelyn Could you please message me as well? Thank you so much!

  • paulyou77paulyou77 Core Member
    74 karma

    Hi. Could you also message me? Thank You! @tallone1234

  • wyleysharpwyleysharp Core Member
    8 karma

    @Kbrookss I'd love to hear what they said!

  • wyleysharpwyleysharp Core Member
    8 karma

    @wyleysharp said:
    @Kbrookss I'd love to hear what they said!

    Sorry @tallone1234 ^^

  • n_o_lsatn_o_lsat Core Member
    105 karma

    @tallone1234 it would be greatly appreciated if you could message me too!!

  • R2sav221R2sav221 Member
    60 karma

    @tallone1234 Same here! I'd be very interested to hear what they predicted!

  • selena.bernardoselena.bernardo Free Trial Member
    2 karma

    Can someone plz message me what was on the crystal ball august 2022 webinar I was unable to attend and I’m dying to know! TY

  • LSATstudier22LSATstudier22 Member
    91 karma

    @alyssamadelyn or @tallone1234 Please message me as well! Thank you!!

  • steelstax-1steelstax-1 Alum Member
    edited July 2022 5 karma

    Id very much appreciate it if you would message me too, this is my second time with the LSATs and really hope to break 170

  • jaibandekarjaibandekar Core Member
    21 karma

    @alyssamadelyn could you also message me pls? thanks!!!

  • lsathereicomelsathereicome Member
    7 karma

    @alyssamadelyn said:
    I'll message you!

    I'd really appreciate it if you could message me too!!

  • Cant Get RightCant Get Right Yearly + Live Member Sage ⭐ 🍌 7Sage Tutor
    27821 karma

    Because I’d heard so much about these, I went just to see. Honesty, there wasn’t anything that anyone with common sense and a reasonable familiarity with the test shouldn’t know. I mean, one of their tips was literally just that the 3 or 4 most recent tests are the best predictors of what the next test is likely to feel like. They also said we are in an era where RC has gotten particularly hard, LG has trended fairly standard, and LR has been far less concerned with routine, structural logic. So if you don’t know, now you know.

  • WhatslsatWhatslsat Member
    476 karma

    @"Cant Get Right"

    Just a few follow up questions RE:"RC has gotten particularly hard, LG has trended fairly standard, and LR has been far less concerned with routine, structural logic".

    Does this mean that we are probably not going to be surprised by a particularly unusual logic game?

    What does LR that's far less concerned with routine, structural logic look like?? (e.g., less conditional logic??)

    Which RC passages from the prev PTs do you think are the most representative of the difficulty we can expect on the upcoming tests? Would they be PTs 80s to 92?? I have been studying with older PTs for RC... :/

  • defrangesco.kdefrangesco.k Member
    4 karma

    @tallone1234 can you message me too, please? :)

  • Cant Get RightCant Get Right Yearly + Live Member Sage ⭐ 🍌 7Sage Tutor
    27821 karma

    @Whatslsat said:
    @"Cant Get Right"

    Just a few follow up questions RE:"RC has gotten particularly hard, LG has trended fairly standard, and LR has been far less concerned with routine, structural logic".

    Does this mean that we are probably not going to be surprised by a particularly unusual logic game?

    I would only go so far as to say that unusual logic games have not appeared in awhile. You should not be surprised by one, but that's because you should be prepared for one despite what recent trends may (but don't necessarily) suggest could be a lesser likelihood of seeing one.

    What does LR that's far less concerned with routine, structural logic look like?? (e.g., less conditional logic??)

    Yeah, less conditional logic, less connecting B to C in order to get from A to D, that kind of thing. For a Flaw question with a simple "A therefore B" argument, for example, the answer is almost certainly not going to be, "Inappropriately assumes that A is sufficient for B." Such an answer would absolutely be correct, but you're a lot less likely to see it.

    Which RC passages from the prev PTs do you think are the most representative of the difficulty we can expect on the upcoming tests? Would they be PTs 80s to 92?? I have been studying with older PTs for RC... :/

    Yeah, RC took a turn somewhere around PT 80 or so. The older PT's are still great practice and great for developing all your foundational skills. More recent tests seem to have ramped up the difficulty, but nothing has fundamentally changed.

  • WhatslsatWhatslsat Member
    476 karma

    @"Cant Get Right" That was very helpful!

    Thank you so much!

  • Elena023Elena023 Alum Member
    5 karma

    @alyssamadelyn Hi could you message me as well please! Thank you!!

  • KbrookssKbrookss Member
    106 karma

    @"Cant Get Right" said:
    Because I’d heard so much about these, I went just to see. Honesty, there wasn’t anything that anyone with common sense and a reasonable familiarity with the test shouldn’t know. I mean, one of their tips was literally just that the 3 or 4 most recent tests are the best predictors of what the next test is likely to feel like. They also said we are in an era where RC has gotten particularly hard, LG has trended fairly standard, and LR has been far less concerned with routine, structural logic. So if you don’t know, now you know.

    Thank you for following back up with us!

  • Cant Get RightCant Get Right Yearly + Live Member Sage ⭐ 🍌 7Sage Tutor
    27821 karma

    @Whatslsat said:
    @"Cant Get Right" That was very helpful!

    Thank you so much!

    @Kbrookss said:
    Thank you for following back up with us!

    You're very welcome.

  • emilygero_emilygero_ Free Trial Member
    2 karma

    @alyssamadelyn said:
    I'll message you!

    can you please message me too!!

  • acc240acc240 Live Member
    23 karma

    @alyssamadelyn can you please message me too please!!

  • babkir19babkir19 Member
    50 karma

    @alyssamadelyn can you message me as well? Thank you!

  • beassefabeassefa Member
    4 karma

    @alyssamadelyn or anyone else with feedback to share about the session - I'd really appreciate if you could share what was discussed with me

  • iowens818-1-1iowens818-1-1 Core Member
    8 karma

    Hello there. Could you also message me please @alyssamadelyn

  • lia-1lia-1 Free Trial Member
    3 karma

    @alyssamadelyn said:
    I'll message you!

    would you mind messaging me too? @alyssamadelyn

  • jzhengesq-1jzhengesq-1 Member
    39 karma

    @alyssamadelyn if you don't mind, could you message me too? Thanks in advance!

  • kbvaleriotekbvaleriote Free Trial Member
    2 karma

    @alyssamadelyn would you be able to message me too? thanks so much :)

  • TokhajaanTokhajaan Member
    130 karma

    @alyssamadelyn can you please message me too? I really needed this and I did not know it was even happening.

  • TokhajaanTokhajaan Member
    130 karma

    @tallone1234 can you please message me too? I really needed this and I did not know it was even happening.

  • leahhawthorneeleahhawthornee Member
    12 karma

    @alyssamadelyn can you possibly message me too? Thank you!

  • jeanfang22-1jeanfang22-1 Alum Member
    6 karma

    @alyssamadelyn can you please message me too? Thank you so much!

  • islawaifuislawaifu Member
    7 karma

    Would you dm me too? Bitter!

  • bcc.phillips.97bcc.phillips.97 Core Member
    edited August 2022 6 karma

    @alyssamadelyn or @tallone1234 would you be able to send me a message as well? I'd really appreciate it :)

  • brown_ellewoodsbrown_ellewoods Member
    17 karma

    @alyssamadelyn @tallone1234 could you send me a recap as well pretty pretty please?

  • ishak.adrianaishak.adriana Core Member
    7 karma

    @alyssamadelyn @tallone1234 would it be possible to send me a message as well? This would be greatly appreciated.

  • ishak.adrianaishak.adriana Core Member
    7 karma

    @"Cant Get Right" said:
    Because I’d heard so much about these, I went just to see. Honesty, there wasn’t anything that anyone with common sense and a reasonable familiarity with the test shouldn’t know. I mean, one of their tips was literally just that the 3 or 4 most recent tests are the best predictors of what the next test is likely to feel like. They also said we are in an era where RC has gotten particularly hard, LG has trended fairly standard, and LR has been far less concerned with routine, structural logic. So if you don’t know, now you know.

    So they think the PT90s are a better predictor than the PT80s?

  • JohnathanJohnathan Core Member
    82 karma

    @"ishak.adriana" As a general rule of thumb, the most recent PTs are the best predictors for the type of questions you're most likely to see on test day. So, if you're testing in August, I'd get one of the new PTs in this week. With that said, at the end of the day don't over analyze and psych yourself out. You've put in the work, be confident in your ability and kick some ass. Best of luck.

Sign In or Register to comment.