RC, LG,RC, LR

JoeyyBonanno · June 6

Just took the june exam-6th. LR was so weird but not hard-if you memorize a bunch of ways on how to do it you fail very abstract. LG - they kind of gave up on it almost like a joke, the first RC so boring in addition to those Russian names , should be illegal to include literature in comparative passages, the second one was a cake walk-pt 19 vibes. what happened to good stuff like formal logic, necessary assumptions....there no telling on this one.

nicholas.leon96 · June 7

Took today as well. Just my luck, had 3 separate system glitches. Loooove ProMetric...

Are they not doing the 7Sage thread where people can discuss the exam?

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Related Discussions

RC, LG,RC, LR

RC RC RC helpJust did an RC drill of PT 53. Actually not bad considering RC is my most least practiced section. 20/27. Stats were: -5 Infer questions -2 Appli…

Are Older RC passages useful? Are older RC less "tight" than newer? Diff btw older and newer RC?Hey all, So I was wondering what you guys felt about drilling older RC passages? (PT's 1-40)? What are some of the biggest differences you fee…

RC, LG,RC, LRJust took the june exam-6th. LR was so weird but not hard-if you memorize a bunch of ways on how to do it you fail very abstract. LG - they kind of g…

LG-LR-RC-LGMy first LG was about security guards (brutal). My second involved camps. I hope the first was was experimental. If anyone has any insight please lmk…

RC book: LSAT Trainer vs. Manhattan RCHi all, I am struggling with RC. Recently, I bought LSAT Trainer. It is really helping me. I am wondering if I should buy Manhattan RC book as well.…

Comments