I have read, and re-read, Mike Kim's explanation on how to approach "Match the Flaw/ Parallel Flaw" questions, and I continue to not identify this correctly...
Any suggestions on how to approach these? I understand it is important to have a strong grasp of the flaw when you enter the questions, but I am consistently wrong in matching conclusions and supports...
Any tricks or obvious tactics would be so helpful!
Comments
Stimulus: A --> B
Conclusion: A --> C
Flaw = we don't know if B --> C