I need some help on this MSS question
The stimulus states that some vitamin-fortified foods have 100% recommend daily intake of vitamin A and D. We also know from the stimulus that some (many) people overestimate the serving size of vitamin-fortified foods, eating two or three times the standard serving. The answer ended up being (B) Some people who consume vitamin-fortified foods exceed the recommended daily intake of vitamin A and D.
But isn't it possible that those who overestimate and eat double servings of vitamin-fortified foods are not eating the ones with 100% recommend daily intake of vitamin A and D?
vff some 100% vit a+d
vff some eat two or three times serving size
Am I interpreting the stimulus incorrectly here?
Comments
A: don't know anything about consumers' mindsets
C: don't know anything about consumers' mindsets
prescriptive statement for which there is evidence. Why shouldn't people take supplements for the vitamins they are not getting in their enriched food?
E: don't know anything about manufacturers' mindsets
Here is their explination:
FACTS:
1-You should not greatly exceed the recommended daily intake (RDA) of vitamins A and D – they are toxic.
2-Some vitamin fortified foods have 100% of the daily intake of those vitamins per serving.
3-Many people eat 2-3x the standard servings of some vitamin fortified foods.
ANALYSIS: We know “some” vitamin fortified cereals have 100% of the RDA. It’s a warranted assumption that other vitamin fortified cereals have a significant percent of the RDA, say 30-50%.
We know some people eat 2-3x the recommended serving. And it’s a warranted assumption that people get vitamin A and D from other food sources – everyone knows that.
This is just a most strongly supported question. It’s probable, though not certain, that at least one person, somewhere in the world, has exceeded the RDA by eating lots of vitamin fortified cereal.