Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Categories

170 :)

acf111591acf111591 Free Trial Member
edited September 2013 in General 45 karma
I hit past 170 benchmark today, i know it's not the real thing but hey! anyway, wanted to clarify because it wasn't a trigger word/phrase i had writtten down "in order to" always introduces sufficient part of the argument? if someone could just reply quick that would be great
Show Related Discussions

Comments

  • acf111591acf111591 Free Trial Member
    45 karma
    just to double check myself
  • James DeanJames Dean Free Trial Member
    edited September 2013 297 karma
    Yes," in order to" is a sufficieny indicator.
  • EuripidesFanEuripidesFan Free Trial Member
    83 karma
    i.e.

    "in order to hit 170, you must dedicate yourself to the lsat"

    If you fail the necessary condition of dedicating yourself to the lsat, then you cannot hit 170.

    By the way congrats. I remember hitting my first 170+ score. I started the test at 12:30 a.m. got done a little after 3. Treated myself to some french toast at Denny's afterwards :) It was a great feeling.
  • acf111591acf111591 Free Trial Member
    45 karma
    that's awesome. yeah the problem i was running into was when in order to was in the second half of the sentence, just wanted to make sure i was translating correctly.
  • KK Free Trial Member
    345 karma
    congrats man
Sign In or Register to comment.