Seeking strategy to avoid getting stuck during Logic Games

Comments

• 1 Like

  Louislepauvre Alum Member

  July 2018 750 karma

  Not sure if I'm saying anything original here, but a clear-cut method for looking where to split is a variable in the rules that is mentioned multiple times. It's very restricted, so that's usually a good place to start looking to split. If you don't have an a-ha moment in regards to splitting, then go to the questions that involve additional conditions, i.e, the "If" questions. Sometimes in doing the questions, I pick up on inferences as a I go. It's inferior to solving the game with all possible worlds, but sometimes it's the best I can do. Plus, making worlds is sometimes not worth it because it can be time consuming and maybe not as helpful for the questions.
• 1 Like

  Ohnoeshalpme Alum Member ⭐

  July 2018 2531 karma

  Becoming fast with easy/medium normal games can give you the time that you sometimes need for a harder game. In this way, even if stumble on a game, you can use all of the cached time from the other questions to help you go -0 on a hard game. With time, you can brute force most of the answers even in really hard games.
• 1 Like

  Lucas Carter Alum Member ⭐

  July 2018 2804 karma

  Find solace and confidence in all of your practice and skills. Know that you have seen most of LSAC's tricks and that they are just trying to paralyze you with fear. Take stock of what pieces you have left and try to keep moving. Don't be afraid to reset with a few deep breaths.
• 1 Like

  Sami Yearly + Live Member Sage ⭐ 7Sage Tutor

  July 2018 10806 karma

  Split should be seen as a way to represent rules or variables rather than a means to solve the game. When I am considering the rules for a game, I am thinking about what's the best way to see this rule; 1. on the side written down, 2. on the master game board, 3. as a split. I prefer always having a rule visually represented and the more a rule is difficult or the variable is a huge player, the more seriously I consider it as a candidate for a split. For example, if representing a rule or variable through a split would mean I will not have 3 of my 4 most difficult rules written on the side, that variable/rule is great candidate for a split.

  Off the top of my head a game that comes to my mind is the famous CD game where you are determining which of the old and new cd's go on sale. If you take a look, the jazz variable is a huge player for that game and right away 3 of the 5 rules written are completely represented visually if you put the three different ways jazz cd's can be sorted. At the end you have 4 game boards with only 1 rule for two of them and they are the easy ones, the other two are completely solved.

  When people split, I see sometimes that they will end up having like 8 game boards. That's what usually tells me that the way a person is looking at what splitting means is wrong. If you are just looking at splitting as a way to represent the rules, I don't think I have ever ended up having more than 5 games boards. If I chose to split, the average game boards ends up being 3. I still have a lot of variables and some rules that may still be in play for each game boards but its simpler to go through.

  A strategy that really helped and was the biggest game changer for me was when I incorporated putting my pencil down when I first come upon a new game. You want to just put your pencil down and read and get a sense of what rules may be difficult or what variables are the biggest players. This helps you figure out a plan for a game before you start the game. It's a hard thing to implement because people do not like just thinking, they want to be writing stuff down as they encounter rules and variables in stimulus. But I can't say enough how important it is to first just think about how a game is being pulled and how you would like to make it easier on yourself.

  Stepping back from a game can give you a better overall picture about if you would like to use a rule or variable as split. For example a block is one of the things that is a great candidate for a split. But whether I chose to split on it depends on other rules of the game. If I see other rules would be affected a lot by its placement and it would help get rid of most rules - I am going to use it as a split. But just because a rule is a block doesn't mean I am going to split it as other rules may not tie to it. In order to make this determination I have to step back a little and just consider things.

  I hope this helped. Let me know if you have more questions.
• 2 Likes

  keets993 Alum Member ⭐ ⏰ 🍌

  July 2018 6050 karma

  If you're feeling paralyzed or stuck, glance at the questions. Are there a lot of questions asking you for flat out inferences without providing additional premises? Are there more questions that provide you with additional premises? If so, do those first. I've found that the LSAT usually forces you to realize the inference halfway through the game if you haven't already figured it out up-front.

  Also, just remember that all games are rule driven. Yes, there are games where you can make inferences up-front and split them effectively to diminish the amount of worlds available, but those inferences are still rule-driven. So when you come across a question, always look back at your rules and your game pieces and take it one step at a time. Eliminate the answer choices that obviously contradict your rules. Map out the remaining if you need to.

  As for splitting, @Sami covered it pretty well. If you think that certain rules are better explored by splitting the game board and piecing them then do it. Sometimes you'll see additional inferences and other times you don't. But taking the 10 seconds upfront to split and find out nothing happens is better than approaching the questions with your mind clouded with the unsurity of 'should I have split' when you're panicky anyway.
• FlyEaglesFly Member

  July 2018 46 karma

  Thanks all - some great advice here!