diffrence between sth that is necessary for A vs sth that necessarily result from A

chengby97 · September 2019

the question is from PT86-s1, could anyone help me to explain differences between the two?

VegaHedging · October 2019

Which question exactly?

pkleehl95 · October 2019

"X is necessary for A" essentially means "A requires X": A --> X
In conditional language "X necessarily results from A" also means A --> X, since if A occurs, X must also necessarily occur. But it also implies a temporal relationship (someone correct me if I'm wrong), meaning that in order for X to occur, A must occur first.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Related Discussions

diffrence between sth that is necessary for A vs sth that necessarily result from A

If a person has to study harder for a good LSAT score will they be at a disadvantage at a T14?Are people who have to study significantly more to get a good LSAT score at a comparative disadvantage if they go to a top school? For example Bob st…

A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument? I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not so…

For those that took the October Digital LSAT, how did you get a fee waiver for a future LSAT?When I took the October Digital LSAT, my prelaw advisor told me that one of the perks of taking the pilot was that you would get reimbursed for a fut…

Asking for a LOR to a professor that you took only one course fromHi all. I'm an international student so please excuse me for my poor writing. So I plan on applying this cycle, having taken the June LSAT and wai…

How do you diagram a conditional that has a group 3 and a group 4 logical indicator?Example: "We cannot have A without B" or "Without A we cannot have B" Cannot = group 4 (negate, necessary) Without = group 3 (negate, sufficient)

Comments