I would recommend doing them for drilling purposes, if you needed to! For example, I used those PTs to help hone in on my reading comprehension skills.
The test was designed for one test to mimic the next, but many people have contributed to writing questions and each test is known for certain things that are harder than another test, but that other test has other things that are thought to be harder. I guess it's sort of relative.
PTs pre-30 are generally used for drilling problem sets of various question types. I think the LGs are still good for fool proofing and the RCs are still useful for testing your strategies. The scores you get are useful data points, but the LSAT world at large usually slices these tests up for drilling.
Comments
I would recommend doing them for drilling purposes, if you needed to! For example, I used those PTs to help hone in on my reading comprehension skills.
The test was designed for one test to mimic the next, but many people have contributed to writing questions and each test is known for certain things that are harder than another test, but that other test has other things that are thought to be harder. I guess it's sort of relative.
PTs pre-30 are generally used for drilling problem sets of various question types. I think the LGs are still good for fool proofing and the RCs are still useful for testing your strategies. The scores you get are useful data points, but the LSAT world at large usually slices these tests up for drilling.
I highly recommend doing the games! They're generally harder so it's great practice.
For the games, yes.