Everyone,
I've practiced every part of the test but the one section that fails to improve is RC. As a result, it prevents me frm getting the scores I want. I've tried annotating, using the memorization method, doing 3 sections for accuracy, but nothing seems to help it improve. I'm currently seeing 14-17 correct in that section. Pretty far off from the rest of my test. Does anyone have any suggestions or did they start doing something that just made it click for them? I've also been working through the Manhattan RC book but I'm not seeing any improvements as a result. I'm willing to put any amount of effort or time in to achieve it.
Thank you.
Comments
I was finding that the more I tried to annotate, go over and over my answers, concentrate until I thought my eyes would bleed, the worse I actually did on RC. Why? Because I was stressed out from the minute I started the section until the end. I was trying so hard to remember everything that it was actually affecting how I was processing the information. Nothing worked as well as when I just concentrated on what the passage was trying to tell me.
This may not all relate to you, but I think trying to relax a little bit and enjoy the passage would help.
@logicfiend
The key to performing well on RC is to not focus too much on the specific details, and to identify the purpose of the passage and the author's thoughts, arguments and assertions. Annotating is a waste of time for the most part and makes it harder to identify the main point because you're spending so much time underlining and circling; however, it is of paramount importance to remember where each critic's argument lies and so on and so forth because some of the questions ask what the format of the passage is (e.g. a new phenomena is introduced, two arguments supporting the innovation's success are duly noted, a critique of the innovation's practical applications is introduced, etc.).
This is how I have studied for it.
First, I got the Trainer because I heard it's superior for RC, and in my opinion it totally is.
It teaches you to break the passage down for structure and not content. I find that the memorization method is hard/difficult to put into practice. But when you train your mind to look at and mark the passage in a way of "this functions in the passage this way" then it's MUCH easier to go back and I find that I know and retain a lot more information than by... trying to retain more information on purpose.
I then started drilling the Cambridge packages. Just two timed passages a day of my worst ones (humanities, social sciences). In time, I find that I have improved a lot.
-Develop a small system of note taking that you will use consistently and understand. It doesn't matter what it is as long as you can instantly remember it. Like.. "X" for "example.." "Va" for viewpoint of author.. " Underline of topic sentences.. whatever comes up frequently. Some people don't use their notes at all in answering the questions, but others do. I rarely do, but when I need it, it helps me zoom right back in on the part of the passage I need.
-Take the two seconds to summarize the paragraph and write a small recap. Especially on dense passages that you're not familiar with and are feeling hard. Yes, it will take 10 seconds or so. BUT the process of formulating the paragraph into your own words forces you to think about what it was actually saying and visualize some of the things it's talking about. Visualization is key
-Like I said, visualization is key. Almost every memory system relies on some of form of visual memorization. The way people remember 20 objects in a list is by visualizing a big chain of those things put together. Why not harness this memorization tactic in the LSAT? For me, it turns into thinking about the people or things in the passage and developing my own little movie in my head. I make a little movie about each paragraph, and guess what? I'm able to recall my own movie in my head WAY better on the questions than if I had strung together some auditory chain of words without visualizing and internalizing their meaning.