Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

How to negate "I told everyone everything about the event."

Rev_LefeRev_Lefe Member

Hi,

I am wondering how would you negate the sentence per title ("Sentence')?
I had three candidates, as follows, in mind, but I don't know which one is most correct:

  1. It is not the case that I told everyone everything about the event.
  2. I told someone everything about the event.
  3. I told everyone something but not all about the event.

Among them, 1. seems the most correct but doesn't further elucidate the Sentence. Both 2. & 3. make the Sentence clearer, yet I can't be sure which one is correct or a proper negation according to logic.

Could someone please explain or share your insights?

Thank you for your help.

Comments

  • miamisquidwardmiamisquidward Free Trial Member
    edited March 2021 7 karma

    Number 1 would be the way I would negate this sentence. However, I would simplify even more by saying " I did not tell everyone everything about the event."

    2 Does not negate the sentence. 2 could be true while the original statement is also true.

    I can see how 3 negates the original in that 3 and the original statement could not be true at the same time. It just comes at the negation at an odd angle compared to number 1.

  • KevinLuminateLSATKevinLuminateLSAT Alum Member
    edited March 2021 983 karma

    OP, #1 is the correct negation, since you can negate anything by adding "it is not the case that" at the beginning. As you noted, however, it's not particularly helpful in understanding the negation. This would be the better way to understand the negation:

    "There is at least one person to whom I did not tell everything about the event."

    Or, even more explicit:

    "There is at least one person to whom I either told nothing about the event, or told some, but not all about the event."

    No. 2 is not a correct negation because it does not contradict the initial statement; "someone" means at least one, so it's entirely possible that "I told someone everything" and "I told everyone everything" are true at the same time. #3 is not a correct negation because you can contradict the initial statement merely by saying nothing; you don't have to tell everyone a partial story in order to falsify the initial statement. So #3 does not encompass the full range of possibilities that falsify the initial statement.

    If you're having some trouble understanding how we can come to the proper negation I described above, read further.

    "I told everyone everything about the event" means that I told 100% of people 100% of what I know about the event. And to make it even simpler, let's say there's 10 people in the world and exactly 10 units of information about the event. If you told all 10 people everything about the event, then you've disseminated 100 units of information (10 people each get 10 units of info).

    The bare minimum required to contradict the initial statement is merely disseminating 99 units of information or fewer. In other words, if at least one person did not get all 10 units of information from you, then you've falsified the initial statement. So, the correct negation encompasses all of these possibilities, for example:

    1. You told 9 people everything, and 1 person 9/10 units of info.
    2. You told all 10 people some, but not all.
    3. You told nothing.

    To capture the entire range of possibilities that contradict the initial statement, then, this would make sense: "There is at least one person to whom I did not tell everything about the event."

  • 1050 karma

    @KevinLuminateLSAT this is such a good explanation!!

  • Rev_LefeRev_Lefe Member
    385 karma

    Thank you, Kevin and miamisquidward, for your helpful explanations!
    So lucid and educational, Kevin's explanation is almost like a tutorial for negation.

Sign In or Register to comment.