Best ways to improve LR section?

Comments

• 1 Like

  Campo1995 Alum Member

  November 2015 74 karma

  I found that I hit a bit of a plateau with LR after using 7 sage. To get to the -2, -3 range I used the LSAT trainer, if you've found that you have gotten as much as you can out of 7 sage I would suggest getting the trainer. Otherwise just do the problem sets and listen to JY's videos, it very well might be enough to get you to your target score for LR
• StopLawying Alum Member

  November 2015 821 karma

  IMHO the best book out there for LR is the Manhattan book, even better than the Trainer.
• 2 Likes

  Pacifico Alum Inactive ⭐

  November 2015 8021 karma

  It's all in the BR. If you do it right it will reveal the patterns of the test to you, especially in the wrong ACs so that you will start to see where they are trying to mislead you and how you need to parse out the correct answer.
• GSU Hopeful Core ⭐

  November 2015 1644 karma

  @StopLawying said:
  IMHO the best book out there for LR is the Manhattan book, even better than the Trainer.
  

  Uh oh. I bet this just caused an attack of some sort for @nicole.hopkins .
• DumbHollywoodActor Alum Inactive ⭐

  November 2015 7468 karma

  @"GSU Hopeful" said:
  Uh oh. I bet this just caused an attack of some sort for @nicole.hopkins .
  

  I really liked Manhattan LR too, especially its categorization of wrong answer types. I’m not sure I’d go so far as to say it’s better than Trainer, but I think they go hand in hand.
  
• GSU Hopeful Core ⭐

  November 2015 1644 karma

  I agree. I wasn't meaning to down Manhattan if I did. The book had a lot of great ideas and tid bits to it. But, I in no way think it is better than the Trainer. But that's just me. Everyone is going to be different.
• nicole.hopkins Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐

  November 2015 edited November 2015 7965 karma

  @StopLawying said:
  Manhattan book, even better than the Trainer.
  

  Well Mike Kim wrote both, and he wrote one of them after the other. So which one do you think it makes more sense to focus on? Version 1.0 or 2.0?
• nicole.hopkins Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐

  November 2015 7965 karma

  @"GSU Hopeful" said:
  Uh oh. I bet this just caused an attack of some sort for @nicole.hopkins .
  

  Nah I got this
• kennedybj Alum Member

  November 2015 697 karma

  can someone explain the best way to BR?
• nicole.hopkins Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐

  November 2015 7965 karma

  @kennedybj said:
  can someone explain the best way to BR?
  

  @c.janson35
• c.janson35 Free Trial Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐

  November 2015 2398 karma

  @kennedybj circle the questions during the test you aren't 100% confident in. Review them after by eliminating all answer choices for concrete reasons, and selecting the right answer choices for concrete reasons. if you have pdf's, try doing this on a blank copy so that you aren't biased towards your original answer choices.
• c.janson35 Free Trial Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐

  November 2015 2398 karma

  Also, try looking here: http://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/3469/what-is-blind-review