I realize that some people notice a drop in their scores once they reach the latest PTs. I don't know how widespread this phenomenon is, but do you think it is wise or advantageous to do an older PT (say, in the 40s and 50s) with a fifth section from a newer PT? Or if I do an older one on one day and the next time I PT, do a more recent one? I've also heard that some of the newer PTs have some experimental logic games, so would alternating between older and newer PTs (the older known for having some funkier games) be a smart move/good way to ensure I am not thrown off too much compared to progressing precisely in chronological order?
Comments
Being exposed to the newest PTs is vital, because there are noticeable differences, but mastering the older PTs first will allow you to handle the differences better.
You can see a BR schedule here: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=7sage.com_ft05lsm54j4ec1s6kj1d1bbpv0@group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/Chicago&pli=1
The BR group schedule is somewhat similar, and if you're thinking of joining the group, which is a lot of useful fun, you should probably go ahead with their schedule.