I know this is a common topic, however I'm new to this forum sooooo I figured I might as well share my diagnostic and see if anyone has any advice or encouragement:) I still have a couple more years of undergrad to go before I apply to law school. I wrote a diagnostic the other day and scored a 140:( I need a 160 to get into a certain school because my GPA will probably be around 3.9 out of 4.0! I will have about 8 months to study when the time comes. Has anyone here gone from around 140 to 160, or know of anyone who has?
Comments
While a twenty point jump from 140 to 160 seems daunting, it is I think different than say, a similar increase from 150 to 170. Learning the fundamentals, mastering (or at least coming close to it) logic games, and being able to quickly identify question types, premises/conclusions, et cetera, gives you a very probable chance of scoring at the 160+ mark.
Getting that increase in eight month's time won't be a gimmie, but I think it's doable, and you have every right and reason to shoot for that increase in that amount of time.
May I ask how you scored on the individual sections?
I'll echo what @danielznelson said. You can absolutely, one hundred percent, can increase your score. I know someone who went from a 139 to a 168. Granted, that took 2 years of prep, but still totally doable.
Don't put get trapped in the paradigm of only "having 8 months to study." You have your goal; 160. So let that be your goal. You will get there!
Also, you have a chance at a great GPA and an amazing LSAT. Why set your goal only at a 160? Aim high and see if you can get a full ride, or possibly even options of attending schools you might not have considered.... Just some food for thought
I truly believe you can increase from 140 to 160. I think 15-20 point increases are very common for those who are willing to dedicate the time and energy into it!
There is also something immensely invaluable in watching questions be solved in real time by someone who has mastered the test like J.Y.
And take it from me, I spent over two months this summer going through Kaplan, Manhattan, Powerscore; you name it, and I thought at one point it was going to be the magic bullet.
And I admit I did learn from fundamentals from Powerscore and Manhattan, but once I started 7Sage my understanding of the LSAT complete changed. My LG score went from -16 to -4 in about 4 weeks. Now, YMMV, but the philosophies behind 7Sage (Blind review, fool-proof, memory method) these are things that actually work. They aren't magic bullets to a 180, but if you put in the work, they work.
I could go on and on. Definitely let me know if you have any specifics...But if you can't tell, I'm a 7Sage convert and LOVE the course and the community that comes with it
The LSAT is unlike almost any other test in that it is essentially testing you on a language - the language of logic. The fact you feel stupefied is about as normal the reaction of someone being tested on an unknown, foreign language for four hours. You likely don't understand or know anything of conditional logic, causation, bi-conditionals, contrapositives, degrees of validity, the differences between necessary and sufficient assumptions, the differences between "most strongly supported" and "must be true," basic conditional diagramming, advanced conditional diagramming, chaining conditional diagramming, existential quantifiers, logical indicators and their respective groups, negation, what it means to weaken an argument as opposed to weakening a premise, intersection relationships... I could go on. Of course your score is going to be lower when you know nothing of these concepts. Once you start learning the fundamentals of the LSAT, everything will begin to change.
Mastering Logic Games is generally the easiest to master of all the section types. It is at least the easiest to progress in. Even getting only within a few points of a perfect score on LG would have given you somewhere between a 10-15 point increase, I imagine. And timing is a killer at first; again, you have no idea what you're doing, so of course you'll be slow.
I think you should feel fine with where you are at, especially because your biggest weakness is what is generally the most learnable, if only due to the fact that it's what most initially know the least of - that, and it's the most mechanical of the sections.
People who say the LSAT isn't learnable are the people who haven't made the effort to learn it. The unique thing about the LSAT is that they give you all of the information you need to answer each question. You really don't bring in any outside knowledge. You just need to learn how to read the information you're given. That's about the most learnable test I've ever heard of. It is just incredibly difficult to learn it.
The LSAT tests so much more than just your understanding of the underlying concepts. It tests your ability to overcome an obstacle in your way. The people who get high LSAT scores aren't the smartest people or the people who start out with the best understanding of formal logic. They're the people who will do whatever it takes to achieve their goals, who will never stay down when they get knocked on their ass, and who have the discipline and determination to see it through to the end. If you're one of those people, I guarantee you can bridge that gap and more.