Hey All,
I've been taking PTs in order (starting from the ancients working up through the 30s). As I'm progressing, I'm noticing a decrease in my score, and it's occurred to me that it's probably because LSAC has implemented some changes in the 2000s. Reading some other discussions, it seems that there are certain focuses that change in the tests as they get newer. I'm wondering if a better strategy would be to mix them up (take a 30 one week, then a 40, then a 50, etc.)? Or should I continue to work on the older ones as I learn and improve my score and save the newer (more relevant) ones for when I get closer to test day?
Thoughts?
(Also, side note- if I have questions on a certain LR question, where can I go to get people's input? I've been commenting on JY's explanatory videos, but there doesn't seem to be much discussion going on there. Considering I've been taking older tests, it doesn't seem that the BR Groups will help me at the moment either.)
Comments
Personally, I would recommend taking PTs 36 - 79 chronologically, as you can gradually get accustomed to the new tricks and techniques that the later PTs begin to introduce. Perhaps someone who mixed it up could offer a different opinion. Either way, it's important to save PTs in the 70s for the final few weeks of studying, as they will be the most accurate predictors of your actual test score.
As for specific questions about old LR questions, you can always post them on the discussion forum. Just put the PT #, section #, and question # along with a brief question stem description in the title, and you'll likely have a couple prompt responses.
Best of luck,
WUB
50
55
60
65
70
75
51
56
61
etc etc.