164 and misbubbled from 19-27 on RC.

Comments

• 1 Like

  stgl1230 Member

  January 2017 821 karma

  Ugh I'm sorry @"Creasey LSAT" that is awful, although 164 is not bad considering you misbubbled a large part of the section. Maybe you can write an addendum on your applications?
• 1 Like

  Sprinkles Alum Member ⭐

  January 2017 11542 karma

  Misbubbling is the devil! Ah man I'm so sorry about that! But if you still managed to get a 164 after misbubbling, that's pretty good. I highly recommend a retake.
• Creasey LSAT Member

  January 2017 423 karma

  @montaha.rizeq said:
  I highly recommend a retake.
  

  Yeah, that's what I am going to do. While the material is still salient, I'm registered to slaughter February. I'll submit apps to those who accept February scores. If I'm not happy with any of the results, I'll hold my hand and just put everything on ice until next fall.
• 5 Likes

  Creasey LSAT Member

  January 2017 423 karma

  On another note, this was my first LSAT. My diagnostic was a 143. A +21 improvement isn't bad. But all I can think about this freakin mistake.
• 2 Likes

  Sprinkles Alum Member ⭐

  January 2017 edited January 2017 11542 karma

  Yeah Creasy. This 164 doesn't reflect your capabilities. Regardless, a 21pt increase isn't something to overlook. Proud of you!