Hi Guys,
I don't really know how to address overconfidence errors. So far, I have been taking my PT's and BRing just the questions I circled, and then BRing the rest of the section. However, it has come to my attention that it is more important to BR the questions that you circled first and then address overconfidence errors.
My question is this: what do you do to address the overconfidence errors? Do you look at your test booklet and see the question you circled and try to see what your reasoning was? What if you don't remember it? I took a PT on Friday and am now reviewing the test bc I was busy yesterday. Do you just try to reason why the one you chose is wrong and all the other answer choices? Or do you look at the answer and then rationalize why that is correct and the others are incorrect.
I'm really confused about the process for the overconfidence errors and would be most appreciative of any insights or help someone can provide me.
Comments
And always remember that the purpose of BR is not to get the right answer. It's to achieve correct understanding which goes far beyond getting the right answer. It can be a grueling process, but if you commit to it and do it right, you won't make those mistakes again. And that's what it's all about.
You can't identify something as an overconfidence error until you know you've missed it. An overconfidence error is a question that you didn't mark for BR but missed. So other than scoring the test, there's no other way to identify OC errors for review.
Oh yeah, I knew that, I meant the significance of checking the section in the preptests first and then reviewing vs entering in the analytics.
I also like to BR LG and RC and then enter all scores into analytics. So what it sounds like to me is it doesn't matter as long as you identify BR and overconfidence questions and then review them.
@"Cant Get Right" sound correct?
P.S. Thanks for all your input and help!!