I like that JY recommends - answering questions that are just about passage A before even reading passage B (to prevent mixing up info in passages).
BUT - here's my question.... I encountered a Comparative Passage on a PT where there were NO questions just about A. There was at least 1 question on passage B....
In a case like that, should I read passage B first, answer the questions on B, then proceed with Passage A?
I tried it that way and it didn't go so well... but it could have been due to other factors.
Comments
For example, after understanding A ...when reading passage B ask:
How is passage B related to passage A (general thrust): that is, is it merely more background to A, is it against or supporting A, is it tangential/supplemental information to A in one particular area presented in A, When reading ask if a particular statement or position presented in B in agreement/against A?, ect.
Bumping this. Half the points I lost on PT 82's RC section went to its comparative passage. For those who score high on RC, how do you handle comparative passages? Do you go about it the same as the rest? I'm almost considering going through all questions right after reading the first passage -- to knock off ACs for different questions where possible -- before hitting the second passage (akin to the Point @ Issue technique JY suggests for beginners in the CC).
This method would probably add 2 minutes plus change, but it'd make the balancing act less daunting and lead to the right answers more definitively. Thoughts?
Hey @FerdaFresh! I haven't done PT 82, but for comparative passages I strongly second what @kellysmelly wrote about keeping in mind how Passage A and Passage B are related to each other. Other then that, I usually go about it the same as I go about any other passage in RC.
I suggest trying out both methods and seeing what works better for you, as RC strategy tends to vary by the individual.
@FerdaFresh
I just do them like any other passages reading the passages first and then doing the questions. I try to keep in mind how they relate/ compare/ contrast when I read the second passage. I didn't miss any on on the RC section of the September test (PT 82).
I would worry a little that taking a break between the two sections to look at the questions could make it harder to effectively compare the two sections, but it could be worth a try.
Thanks for the two cents guys!
I go through all the questions after Passage A. You may not complete many or any questions all the way, but you can eliminate loads of wrong ACs with absolute confidence. On this first run through, I frequently eliminate 40% to 50% of all the ACs. Going through the questions again after reading Passage B, it provides an enormous advantage and I don't have to worry so much about tracking where the details are coming from.
@"Cant Get Right" Yeah, this is the approach I think works best.
If you very high into the 170's, you might have the ability to simultaneously keep two different points of view separately clear in your mind. If you can do this, then read A, read B, do the questions. But, I find it very challenging to do that so I don't presume that others can.
In the 50's PT explanations where A/B passages first start appearing, you'll see me advocate all sorts of different approaches. They were new and I was trying to figure out how best to approach them. But in the 70's and into the 80's explanations, you'll see that I exclusively handle them by reading A, taking a pass at the answers, then read B and taking a second pass.
Wow! This approach definitely helps! Tried it on my first comparative passage using this strategy and let's just say I got 7/7 on the passage.
I couldn't be happier! Scored my highest on today's Timed RC section with 21/27.
Definitely recommend it to others! And thank you @FerdaFresh for bringing this post to my attention.
LIFE SAVER.
Yeah, I'm definitely among the others who can't. I just don't have the mental capacity to track that level of complexity within the kind of time frame we're dealing with. So the easiest solution to me is to just remove the complexity. No reason to deal with an inherent limitation if you can circumnavigate it all together.
These messages just made my day thank you all for the input!
Thank you to everyone for your advice and tips here!