Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
beth.flanders
About
- Username
- beth.flanders
- Joined
- Visits
- 290
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Speaking from experience, I never practiced the writing section and I did not finish in time. Quite embarrassing and good thing i'm retaking. I think what happened is I didn't have the stamina for another 35 minutes, a tough lesson learned. I've pra…
-
It would be a couple of lessons after the causation theory. I believe it is called "4 possible explanations" and also the next lesson after that called "causation strategy."
-
@Mellow_Z said: @gioaragon95 said: @"beth.flanders" Thank you so much Beth for the explanation. No I know how to read such a statement. I didn't know that there was quite a distinction with some and many. I just …
-
I don't believe this to be a double negative situation. Here we have two separate thoughts. No laws is the first idea, the second idea no crimes. A negation as we know it or a contrapositive in LSAT splits two worlds in half, so a society with no l…
-
In this instance, I believe that "status" would mean the importance or strength of the counterexamples in the argument.
-
Got the email, i think i was wishing it was different from seeing the score beforehand. Definitely no error there. Congrats to everyone who reached their goal!
-
@pirateJLD16 you can log into your LSAC account, click on the tab at the top labeled LSAT, on the pull down menu select LSAT status.
-
i haven't received an email yet, but i logged into LSAC and i was able to retrieve the pdf docs. Looks like its back to the grind
-
@dennisgerrard, JY talks about "but not otherwise" under the advanced biconditional section of the curriculum. Also, i usually think of the word "otherwise" as an "or else" condition. So on PT26.S3.Q22 I would summarize as: It is acceptable for Kay…
-
@Dillion i don't recall it either.
-
After surviving the computer virus game, I would not skip any of the older or odd types of games. I spent most of my time studying the "norm" type LG's (for lack of better words) and reviewed from time to time the older games. Hindsight is a wonderf…
-
@ThePaperChase, but your question on the Misunderstanding the Meaning of the Word was a real section not experimental which i thought was one of your questions. Sorry if i misunderstood your question.
-
interesting, i didn't have any survey on my answer sheet.
-
Hi @ThePaperChase, Dillion's been keeping a list of real/experimental on this thread https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/8821/september-2016-lsat-real-experimental-sections-keywords.
-
Never a dumb question. At the top of the screen select "Course" and then select the "Syllabus" from the pull down menu. Scroll down to the appropriate topic (ie Main Point). On the right hand side of the topic name is a small graphic that looks like…
-
This would really stink! I've used my tablet to do a few PT's and it was so awkward, especially when trying to erase or cross out.
-
I just took the Sept LSAT as well and contemplating my next step. I'm going to take a few days off for sure and then jump back in to a degree. I too have heard of folks taking time off, coming back and have everything click. I think this would be a…
-
@LSATKingsman @LSATKingsman said: Had 3 LR can someone confirm if Misunderstand the meaning of a word question was real or fake? I believe that is real, i also had this question and only 2 LR sections.
-
@"Dillon A. Wright", yes all of those sound familiar for LR.
-
computer virus game definitely a killer for me, i ended up on guessing. I was hoping it was experimental because I had two LG sections. Both the LR sections seemed odd, not a lot of abstract language which i guess can be a good thing. On the one RC …
-
I'm not sure if i understand exactly what the question is but in my opinion I don't believe you need to determine sufficiency and necessary from the answer choice but instead look for what can be concluded (the judgments) given by the premises (prin…
-
I could be wrong but i believe 7Sage has an example of one in the Miscellaneous Question Types of the curriculum, see PT19.4.5. It's my understanding that Evaluate the Argument Questions are very rare, something like .05%.
-
ditto to all the comments above but I must add that 30+ is definitely not too old, not even close to being too old. I started studying for the LSAT back in 2012 at age 48. In between life's twists and turns, I had to put it on the back burner -- for…
-
@"Grey Warden" the export button can be found under the Resources - LSAT Analytics' menu. Then click on the Questions Table Tab and scroll to the very bottom of the screen. You can then copy and paste into excel.
-
@nye8870 and @"GSU Hopeful" I completely agree, 7Sage is soooo much better! @disasterpiecev, you are correct and thank you for correcting me. We cannot properly infer Most cars are not Sedans. I had "few" (3-4) on my mind which implies some are, m…
-
Under the Resources pull down menu select Logic Game Explanations. Scroll down and you will see the respective PrepTest Icon and to the right of each icon click on the appropriate game you want to review. https://7sage.com/logic-game-explanations/
-
The inferences (MBT) that Manhattan are making are correct. They are just reiterating one of the statements using different words and not combining the two statements to make a inferences. So in your first example: @"mc_meatt" said: 1. Some cars ar…
-
I don't use the Tri-cons so I don't know about the stickiness but Staples has the Tri-cons for purchase. http://www.staples.com/Tri+conderoga+pencils/directory_Tri-conderoga+pencils?
-
PT 37 G3 was quite a challenging (and time sink) game for me especially because of the use of referential groups rather than reference to specific items. I would agree with @allison.gill.sanford in that I wasn't exposed to this slight twist on the g…
-
Thanks @DumbHollywoodActor, i'm really hoping to join this one tonight..trying to get the snowblower working for tomorrow's expected nor'easter...fingers crossed.