Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
JS
About
- Username
- JS
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I just bought some books about personal statement on Amazon and hope it helps.
-
For three LR section, I am pretty sure which one is the experimental section because the second one I took has one stimulus but two questions (Q9-Q10), which is certainly not the modern LSAT style(after PT60s)
-
Thanks for your post. It seems that it you talk anything about the real test details you will be banned at tls....
-
In China, we also got a "Nelson Mandela" but it seems he will never ever get out of that prison.
-
Also, if you want, I can do the exact PT you do on the same day so we can go through the problem together.
-
Sure Michelle, I am Justin also at Philly. E-mail me sunyuchencn@gmail.com. I have done all the PTs from 36 to 66 so if you have questions feel free to ask me. Also, cause it is my last semester at Penn I spent most of time redo those PTs. Hope yo…
-
You misunderstand the passage. From passage, we know that abstract expressionism means "a movement in which painters conveyed their private attitudes and emotions using abstract way" and second generation of abstract expressionists also are overly l…
-
Your score is impressive and amazing. I have done all PT from 46 to 66 and left last three for the last week. Now I am doing PT from 36 to 45 and I am around 167-169 now. I am quite hesitate to take the October test cuz I won't take it unless I go…
-
wow, that's amazing. Hope next year I can end up in my dream school and I will definitely purchase 7sage law school service!
-
Jon's explanation is wrong for many layers. First, for A it seems to be BP/-->C not BP--C/, I think he draw completely opposite map. Second, he didn't catch the real reason about why A is wrong. A is wrong because it didn't do anything about th…
-
@CJ Shin, you can look at my new comments. Any thoughts?
-
Also, I think Jon's explanation about PT55 S1 Q21 may be wrong. http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-21/
-
@bedouin, I though 155 maybe a pretty good start. If you start now, u can spend one month finish most of courses and do PT everyday, which I believe will be helpful. Even if you can't do good at exam like above 170, your reading and logical skill wi…
-
Thank you for your reply. I find it seems when comes to assumption, premise, conclusion, all questions seem to be same. Add one more example, this one talks about "mammal other than seal" http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-3-questio…
-
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-3-question-01/ This stimulus talks about human treatment but the correct answer is about laboratory animal.
-
Even for most supported question we can also see the weaken/strengthen here. For instance, http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-13/ Modern crocodiles seems to be irrelevant to hadrosaur but it debut the presumption here “a…
-
http://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/152/the-secret-to-do-tough-weakenstrengthen-question click here.
-
Hey, @Chris Beal, I wrote a post about strengthen/weaken question. Maybe you can take a look
-
At first when I do those questions, I eliminate the correct question quickly cuz they seems to be irrelevant. After thousands of mistake, I finally found the trap here.
-
@Ponyboy, @CJ Shin, JY's example of "cannot" (e.g. You cannot fight crime and run marathons. ) seems to be different from this one. But it seems still cannot means negate necessary here.
-
Thank you for your patience. For me, organic (consisting of different parts that are all connected to each other)seems to be a structure. But holistic and nonlinear seems to be characteristic.
-
haha, @K, good luck !
-
Yeah I know why E is right but I still confused about B. In the stimulus, philosopher claim that the overall structure of a phenomenon (Nature) is organic, holistic, nonlinear. And also philosopher recommend we use the identical overall structure o…
-
It seems we speak the same? If artwork's creator incapable of experiencing, then artwork cannot express an emotion. equals to If "expressing an emotion" then "capable of experiencing." And also, how can you know cannot X, not Y means if not Y …
-
@K, B and C is very easy to eliminate cuz from stimulus we know we should look for the conclusion like XXX--->both banned or both legal.(necessary condition). But in B and C, the y both put this one in the sufficient condition, which is definitel…
-
You mean the TSX-400 pesticide one? This question is quite tough. I think JY definitely should post video for this question. Also, pseudo-sufficent question we can definitely predict the answer. In the stimulus, we know that one legal pesticide…
-
@K, haha, now I can be a peer instructor. Take easy, this question is quite simple cause it is sufficient assumption question and we can totally predict that. In the question stimulus, we know journalist recycled the old photographs, which seems to…
-
wow, @paulfan2011, I found you become peer instructor! Congrats! I envy your title!
-
So it means that those who eat a special seafood dishes only occupy a small share of the whole people who eat seafood in that restaurant ? which I think explain why Careful testing showed that most people who ate seafood at the restaurant on that da…
-
haha, I already got that on my iPhone！AWESOME! Many thanks ! Alan and JY !