^Exactly. Probably just watch a couple of the videos in the writing section of the core curriculum and practice one or two and you'll be set.
Admin Note: https://7sage.com/lesson/does-lsat-writing-matter-and-other-questions-v1/
If I am understanding you correctly, I think you are pretty much right here. Like you say, if your second premise was N-m->/A instead of N—>/A then you could not conclude G –m→ /A because it would then be a "some" relationship between G and /A…
Just want to emphasize one point that @"valentina.soares-1" said, spend time on the concepts that aren't clicking. I was so focused on keeping up with the study schedule 7Sage gave me that I did not do my due diligence and take time to fully compreh…
Exactly, did it for every question type. It was actually @MTreigys who said this method worked best for him, so I'm just stealing it. Short answer to your question: yes, every question type, with a special focus on the questions I got wrong.
Long a…
Wow, this is a really good question and I hope someone smarter than me answers it because it has been throwing me for a loop while thinking about it. When searching on the forums, I found a related explanation to your question (here's the link: http…
Second what pnwrunner says about waiting to take PTs until completing the CC. Will also recommend that when you get to the PTs you take it slow and really review each PT in depth. Don't try to burn through one a day to get them done. The improvement…
Also recommend really paying attention to trap wrong AC's as you go through the curriculum (try to find the patterns in the test from LSAT writers). This could save you a lot of time as I ended up essentially going back through the curriculum to do …
PT 61, Sec. 2, Q. 24. Ran into this problem yesterday and made a note to go back to it and try to find questions like it because the conditional logic is unconventional, at least to me.
Echoing everything Matt said and just want to add that something that has helped me when mapping and trying to find the parallel AC is to map the stimulus using the general A, B and C ("if A, then B") rather than making the mapping particular to the…
This sounds awesome! Thank you all for offering this. Unfortunately, I will not be able to make it during that time, is there any chance you all will be able to record it and post the video on your site? Thank you!