A bit frustrated. A one point decline from September. I gambled and decided to apply later in the cycle thinking I had a good shot to improve on September. Didn't work out. Not the end of the world I guess.
@izabellanna123 said:
Did anyone with only two LRs have a question about different med students, trying to diagnose patients, and being told a specific diagnosis from their first advisor, then trying to diagnose again with a second advisor. Or…
Unless you absolutely need to take the October test I'd definitely suggest postponing until you have some more time to prepare. If you're set on doing, then taking the most recent tests makes sense since they're likely to be most representative of w…
I do think the newer tests are slightly harder. My theory is the scale has become slightly less generous over time as prep materials have gotten better and the games have become more of a science. Someone taking Prep Test 10 is probably better posit…
I feel like it's super hard to answer something like this without knowing how many you left blank. Assuming you still have the test I'd just count up how many you didn't answer. If you want to be super conservative you could just say you got 20% of …
38 has a -13 curve too. I sorta suspect that if some of these earlier tests were given today they would have slightly less forgiving curves since prep materials have gotten better.
You need some answer choice that explains why dried grass clippings have this beneficial effect that fresh ones do not. Answer Choice D offers that in that they kill beneficial bacteria. Answer Choice E provides further context but it still doesn't …
Definitely agree with waiting to take until your ready but I do think there's something to be said about shooting for an earlier date and then postponing if you're not at your target score yet to keep a sense of focus. Also as LSAT_Wrecker said good…
@"Michaela.Pratt1" said:
@Qualia88 said:
Hi everyone,
Was looking for a bit of advice. Just got my November score back and unfortunately it wasn't what I was hoping for. I ended up with a 166 while straight up bombing the …
Pretty disappointed. Ended up with a 166 which was pretty far below my PT average. I knew games would be make or break for me and sure enough I bombed them. Really didn't want to sit out another cycle as I'm already 30 but think that's my best optio…
The one time I find it's valuable is when using charts. It's just too time consuming for me to redraw those type of game boards so I like to just add new pieces to my master gameboard (circling them so I can tell them apart from the original pieces)…
Anti-theft was real. I thought RC and the two LRs weren’t bad but I really didn’t do great on LG. Disappointing since I’ve spent so much time on that but we’ll see. Did have the experimental LG as my first section and was proud of myself for staying…
I assume its somewhat easier to study for the test now as opposed to 15 years ago given new resources like 7Sage and more material to study from. Given that they are keeping the curves the same with X percent of people scoring over 170, it makes som…
Was a little surprised reading this thread how many people didn't seem concerned with this at all. I agree with OP that being able to know down to the second, at least for me, is pretty important. I hate the feeling of having to bubble in an answer …
Perhaps practice your pacing so you can bank a little extra time for these passages. Not sure if you have the core curriculum but it has a good overview of science RC and a number of practice science passages. In any case, I think just do as many of…
This requires getting a little deeper into the game but when I see a bunch of questions without additional info and I haven't already solved for all gameboards or have a good understanding of the constraints that's a decent sign I'm missing inferenc…