Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
c.janson35
About
- Username
- c.janson35
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,908
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive Sage, Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
This article isn't directly about the topic you've discussed, but it may help to provide you with an answer: https://www.law.yale.edu/admissions/jd-admissions/ask-asha/scholarship-deadlines-truth-power Also, you can always call LSAC directly and …
-
It really depends on where you want your score to be raised to. I think a month is enough time to significantly improve your LG score, and if by maxing that out it gets you to where you want to be, then maybe it's the route you'll choose to follow. …
-
The only thing that matters is the violation of the precept. This is because there is only one way to violate a precept/ disprove a general rule/ offer a counterexampe/ assign a false truth-value to a conditional statement: the sufficient occurs wit…
-
The problem with trying to conclude anything from "not functional" is that it is the necessary condition of the contrapositive that you have diagrammed. Nothing can be gleaned from telling us the necessary condition occurs because it can always stan…
-
The main point is something that must be true, so you can eliminate wrong answers by combing answers for inaccuracies, conflations, and "out-of-scopeness". You may have internalized this already, but taking this as a concerted approach to these ques…
-
Right @nye8870, if you just stick a not in the second clause of the dog tail example it's not exactly the negation. Negating the second clause "then you have a tail" would be "then you may not have a tail" or "then you do not necessarily have a tail…
-
You can follow these rules... If changes to "even if", and you negate the opposite clause. Only if changes to "even if", and you negate the same clause. Unless changes to "even if", and you negate both clauses.
-
The Bruce voice.
-
Yes, request a specific letter and a general one. Make sure to specify as much in the requests. Then, when you are choosing which letters to assign to which schools, you'll have the ability to assign the specific one to the school it is tailored to.
-
@Pacifico said: If you can't see the flaw/gap (and there is one), skip it... The former is the most important factor and the latter is the second most important in my opinion... Sometimes you can let the ACs feed you as long as you know what the co…
-
Another reason why C is incorrect, which can help show why E is correct, is that it does not address the issue of time that is involved in the stimulus. We are trying to explain a recent trend, but C gives no mention of time. The problem with that i…
-
C only tells us that many students are unsure. There's a few problems with this. First, many students could mean one student, which means that one student is unsure, and if this is the case, then how could this one student account for the dramatic …
-
I think it's useful to phrase these questions in terms of "why/how...... even though....?" For example, this question would read: "how is it that hisssing developed from a common ancestor to fend off predators even though the common ancestor's preda…
-
There's a difference between memorizing the flaws and familiarizing yourself with them. It's not necessary that you memorize any lists, but you definitely want to take your time to familiarize yourself with the most common flaw types, whether that b…
-
BD-->RWM Gris believes: PAUBG ------------------- Gris /BD SA: PAUBG--->/RWM This links as such: PAUBG-->/RWM-->/BD We know that Gris believes PAUBG; thus, Gris /BD. For what it's worth. This question is from section 4.
-
A good rule to follow when you're seeking help with a specific question is to include the prep test number (or preferably a link to the video) so that the person looking doesn't have to do extra work. It also helps to be accurate with the section nu…
-
@Pacifico is usually on first call... Anything he can help you with?
-
@shainabarber one of the hidden "secrets" of the LSAT... At the beginning of each section they tell you how many questions are in the section. Right under "Time--35 minutes."
-
Spoiler Alert: Principally Principles is also in the works. Brought to you by the law firm of Janson & Hopkins. (And @nicole.hopkins is totally fine with being the second name on the wall...)
-
I think the breaking of momentum is an overstatement, but really it's personal. It would terrify me to bubble after each page, so I methodically bubble after each question. (Side note: I bubble after each page when I enter answers into the 7sage app…
-
You're also making the assumption that street criminals can't afford the most expensive attorneys, which isn't something you can take for granted out of hand. There's nothing to say that criminals who commit "lucrative crimes" are necessarily the mo…
-
N or M--> S If N is in, S is in. If M is in, S is also in. If N and M are in, S is still in, because each is enough by themselves to guarantee S; having both of them is like a double whammy. /S-->N or M This means that if /S, then either N…
-
@mrdeamor two PTs this week is certainly fine in my opinion, as is taking a test after Tuesday. You have to weigh the anxiety you might face by not doing LSAT stuff against the benefits of doing last minute studying, which admittedly won't be that f…
-
The data does not prove that there is little correlation; for all we know, the data could prove a clear U-shaped correlation. For what it's worth, LSAC wouldn't ask a question like this, at least in my opinion. A more realistic question would conclu…
-
@jidazhengqian logically all we know is that one student who received a passing grade was the least enthusiastic. Let's call this student Karen. From this premise, the author is concluding the courses are not serving their purpose in ensuring that o…
-
I wanted to get rid of LG jitters, so I did a complete LG section, then followed it up with the first 10 questions of an LR, and read one RC passage/answered a couple of its questions. All from PT74. Then wrote 177 on the front of my warmup booklet,…
-
Hahah @Pacifico finding this thread after 3 years is harder than the LSAT...
-
It's definitely a small sample, but I thought that the older Feb tests were definitely weirder in form than older tests of other months. I remember them as having a lot of weird except questions, in particular. The new Superprep2 test is definite…
-
"Misreading" isn't an accident, especially not 7 times. It may feel as if all you did was miss a word, but in reality there was a small lapse in your understanding. Maybe this was caused by a lack of concentration, or maybe it was caused by skills t…
-
Yes the scenario you describe is entirely possible, which is why this is a MSS question and not a MBT question. If many people are double/triple the serving, and if many enriched foods have 100% of the RV, then there is support for the idea that som…