To add one, in my experience, the LSAT, was and continues to be (nov tester!) an incredibly difficult exam and one that not only challenges your logical reasoning but also, and more importantly, your mental fortitude. For context, I've been studying…
i think understanding the following would be helpful
to prove this:
NOT (Addiction -> Dependence & Abuse)
show an instance of this:
addiction and NOT (D or A or both)
c: NOT (Addiction -> Dependence & Abuse)
p: cancer patients: dependence & /abuse
in order to prove C (that it's not the case that addiction leads to d & abuse), we need to show one case that's addiction and NOT Dependence or NOT Abu…
thank you for the comments -- appreciate it. I think the root of this dilemma stems from my complete lack of motivation to study now, and that made me reflect more about a potential legal career and whether or not I did indeed want to pursue it afte…