HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
| sections | 12.9K | 18.3K |
-
How to know when to postpone?I might be losing it. I'm plateauing in the low to mid 160's (162-166) and I'm aiming for a 172+. With only weeks left to go to the September exam, s…
... list of LG and LR problems that have stumped ... /> >
> On LR, I make so many stupid ... here can be anywhere from -2 to -6 though.
... focus on doing LG and LR intensives, where I would ... mistakes are you making on LR sections? Is it a certain ... -
For those of you who scores 170+ on PT 70s .
... /> 1) The stimuli in the LR sections are incredibly unorthodox in that ... down.
2) The question STEMS in LR are also tricky ... through, and the questions are LR-heavy (weakening/strengthening and even ... -
Month left and me and Flaw questions still don't get along...So about a month out from the September test and I'm feeling....okay. There is one kind of questions that really bothers me though. Flaw. People alwa…
... while nearly acing the other sections
>
> Dude ... . Did perfect on LG. My LR was a bit messy at ... /> I went -7 RC, -1/-2 LR and -1 LG for a ... -
Method for tackling LRSo I've compiled a very thorough list of all of the LR problems that I've missed or struggled mightily with on previous PTs, and have gone over them …
... list of all of the LR problems that I've missed ... as if they were real LR sections - doing 26-27 problems at ... 'm still missing anywhere from 2-5 of them each "section ... -
Good morning 7Sage, Happy Eclipse...I need some suggestionsGood morning 7Sage, As a few of you already know this weekend I gave myself a reality check. Obviously a few weeks out from test day is NOT the…
... banked time, im down to 2-3 per section, still aways ... for the next few weeks. LR sections with fully implemented skipping. EVERYONE ... -
Suggestions for getting closer to BR scoreHey guys, Any advice on how can I further close the gap? I score low to mid 160s timed and score mid 170s in BR. It has been like this for about …
... .
When you do LR sections try practicing being a bit ... weaknesses. Taking a PT every 2 or 3 days when you ... -
finally!! hard work does pay off!I plateaued around 168 and did PT65 this Wednesday (six sections). I finally break 170 (this is my 6th PT) and scored 174 (with a BR score 179)!!!…
... did PT65 this Wednesday (six sections).
>
> I ... my breakdown:
> -2 LR (BR -2; still haven't figured out ... )
> -6 RC (BR -2 still need to work on ... RC)
> -0 LR (my best LR so far!!!! really excited ... -
Outlier score and help with LR/RC!Hello all, After finishing the CC and attempting about 5-6 PTs , I noticed I was still hovering around 158-160 so I revisited the CC and that sam…
... -6 each on LR and 0 to -2 on LG. I ... -4 on each LR, -6 on RC and -2 on LG.
LR sections, your fundamentals still need some ... really helped me get my LR score were revising J. ... essential to doing well on LR.
Also, you ... -
September vs December LSATHey yall (from Texas), I am registered for the September LSAT, but I am wondering what yall think about pushing I am doing 0 LG and -1 to -3 on…
... round 1 with only about 2 minutes usually. My blind ... get more time on LR sections before the September test ... under 40 seconds, level 2 50 seconds, level 3 ... get more time on LR sections before the September test ... and re-doing timed sections. I know if I ... -
Took PT 80 like you guys said...W.T.F? 167 -8 in one LR section? 6 in a row... -0 in RC? Do I even know this test? You guys are trolling me.... I've NEVER gone -0 in RC and…
I totally bombed both LR sections (1st section was worse than ... right, usually I'm at -2!). And now I'm reviewing ... 5th section and I got -2 in LR... Not sure what is ... -
Took PT 80 like you guys said...W.T.F? 167 -8 in one LR section? 6 in a row... -0 in RC? Do I even know this test? You guys are trolling me.... I've NEVER gone -0 in RC and…
... /> > I totally bombed both LR sections (1st section was worse than ... right, usually I'm at -2!). And now I'm reviewing ... 5th section and I got -2 in LR... Not sure what is ... of questions on the first LR absolutely killed me. 19-24 ... -
4 / 5 PT sectionCan somebody please explain that to me? I was under the impression the that LSAT was 4 sections with the additional section for the writing sample...…
... test day will be 5 sections long: 2 LR, 1 LG, 1 RC ... , and 1 extra of the preceeding sections ... it to inform future, graded, sections.
The reason that ... doesn't release the experimental sections. One way to recreate realistic ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Had 2 RC sections - one contained the passage on ... difficult as well, but the LR wasn't that difficult.
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had an extra LR with a LR-LG-LR-LR-RC order. This was ... />
I felt like the LR sections were pretty fair, and characteristic ... the rest of the test. -2/-6/-12/-18 is my ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had 3 LR sections. I think we need to ... order of the the three LR sections isn't the same for ... 25Q LR and one 26Q LR. My test order was LR LG LR; LR RC ... thinking one of the 25Q sections was an exp., but what ... who had 2 RC or 2 LG sections to ID as many LR Q ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> ANYONE WITHOUT 3 LR SECTIONS: Do you recall a question ... hoping the first section of LR was the experimental because I ... /> >
I had 2 LRs and do not remember ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
>
> Do ... ; Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was ... in the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ... desperate haha. Thanks!!!
2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> ANYONE WITHOUT 3 LR SECTIONS: Do you recall a question ... hoping the first section of LR was the experimental because I ... ;
Yeah I had 2 LRs and this was one ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> >
> ... ; Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was ... in the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ... . Thanks!!!
>
> 2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
>
... again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this ... in the real LR. I had 2 sections and do not ... ; > ANYONE WITHOUT 3 LR SECTIONS: Do you recall a question ... ;
I had 2 LR's and this was 100 ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> > >
LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was ... in the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ... /> > >
> > 2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Yup! I had 2 LG.
> @rene4231 ... :
> ANYONE WITHOUT 3 LR SECTIONS: Do you recall a question ... hoping the first section of LR was the experimental because I ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... -169. I had RC LR LG RC LR The test was hard ... the test. I finished both LR sections right before the 5 minute ... and felt great about both sections. On the food/QG rule ... drinking begin...I woke up 2 hours before my alarm today ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> ANYONE WITHOUT 3 LR SECTIONS: Do you recall a question ... hoping the first section of LR was the experimental because I ... ;
I had only 2 LRs. And I definitely had ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... I had RC LR LG RC LR The test was hard ... test. I finished both LR sections right before the 5 minute ... and felt great about both sections. On the food/QG ... begin...I woke up 2 hours before my alarm ... you equally confident on both sections? I'm frustrated because ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 3 LR sections, and I'm pretty sure section 3 (2nd LR section ... though, does anyone who had 2 LRs remember a strengthen (I ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the experimental.
Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I can remember.
... . Killed it
Section 5: LR. Killed it
... struggled for the first two sections and, overall, it feels ... score will hinge on S2 LR. LR is my strongest section, and ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... experimental.
> Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I can remember.
> ... struggled for the first two sections and, overall, it feels ... . By the end of section 2, the test really felt like ... October!
One of my LR sections was really tough as well ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... experimental.
> Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I can remember.
> ... it
> Section 5: LR. Killed it
>
sections and, overall, it feels ... score will hinge on S2 LR. LR is my strongest section, and ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... experimental.
> Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I can remember.
> ... it
> Section 5: LR. Killed it
>
sections and, overall, it feels ... score will hinge on S2 LR. LR is my strongest section, and ...
