Thursday May 31, 2018 and Saturday June 2, 2018 is PT 65 ? Just want to double check. Sorry I tried going back to check the dates but unfortunately I can't go that far.
Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)
... ; For sure. I went from -22 LR diagnostic to -6 on ... 60, and -20 on PT 65. I have absolutely no idea ... />
UGH. I went -12 on 65 and 2 months later -19 ...
... ; For sure. I went from -22 LR diagnostic to -6 on ... 60, and -20 on PT 65. I have absolutely no idea ... ; UGH. I went -12 on 65 and 2 months later -19 ...
... LG score difference for PT 36 and 52 is that PT ... 36 had one of the toughest ... in LSAT history while PTs 39-54 had the easiest LG ... fool-proofing the LGs from 31-38 and use PT 70 ...
... ; For sure. I went from -22 LR diagnostic to -6 on ... 60, and -20 on PT 65. I have absolutely no idea ... ; UGH. I went -12 on 65 and 2 months later -19 ...
... LG score difference for PT 36 and 52 is that PT ... 36 had one of the toughest ... in LSAT history while PTs 39-54 had the easiest LG ... fool-proofing the LGs from 31-38 and use PT 70 ...