... as you. I miss more flaw questions and the newer PT ... I cannot immediately see the flaw and fall for a trap ... an assumption in the argument which the argument has already accounted for ... critically to identify that the argument already considered this (I don ...
Yes, it makes sense! For me, I know I have a problem of describing what's wrong with the argument so what I tried to do is identify the flaw in my own words then see if it matches with one of the answer choices. Getting more exposure helps as well.
My strategy on Flaw questions is actually to avoid ... looking for the gap/flaw in the argument all together. If I ... prompt and think about the argument through the lens of each ... to identify the specific flaw in an argument without the assistance of ...
... want to effect in an argument and the different parts that ... make up the argument. As it turns out, what ... what is wrong with the argument (which is much easier to ... the answer that exposes that flaw. Tempting wrong answers will relate ...
... my mind that the "most" argument seemed reversed. But I thought ... it would still strengthen the argument because it shows a relationship ... be committing a grave reasoning flaw if you were to say ...
... need to strengthen the economists argument," that's definitely true, ... precisely pick apart the argument structure regardless of the ...
The gap in the argument: conflating "money" with "high salary ... big flaw here, while C does. C weakens the argument by ...
... doesn't address the argument of the Economists properly"**< ... argument properly. That is, we already know there's a flaw ... say much about the economists argument**
The ... a source for understanding the argument/referential statements.
... doesn't address the argument of the Economists properly"**< ... argument properly. That is, we already know there's a flaw ... a source for understanding the argument/referential statements.
> ... the conclusion in this argument is somewhat referential--and ...
... is paraphrasing the economists' argument by saying they "overestimate ... doesn't address the opposing argument, but usually those are ... actually a party in the argument staking their claim -- they ... the flaw you're alluding to (not addressing the argument) comes ...