... knowing how they built their argument and then matching it.
This is a valid argumentform. We need to match it ... what support is backing the argument. Is it confusing sufficient and ... ? whats going on in the argument that is bad. Then match ...
... descriptions. Try to categorize each cookie-cutter. Even categorize the wrong ACs ... will have plenty of non-cookie-cutters, but if you fool ... proof the cookie cutters, you should build up ...
@amw26 I just took 80 and 81 in the past week. I think they were pretty standard, they were kinda like the 70s tests, but I thought (especially 81) their games were a lot more cookiecutter. PT 80 has one strange game, but it's definitely doable.
... when I hit valid argument forms; I just finished ...
I categorized each valid argumentform into **3 groups**, based on ... is ‘related’ to their respective argumentform (all, some, most), such ... ; C have outside of this argument/world.
... > I categorized each valid argumentform into **3 groups**, based on ... is ‘related’ to their respective argumentform (all, some, most), such ... ; C have outside of this argument/world.
> argument forms. I made notecards ...
... gt; I categorized each valid argumentform into **3 groups**, based on ... is ‘related’ to their respective argumentform (all, some, most), such ... ; C have outside of this argument/world.
> > ... the valid and invalid argument forms. I made notecards ...
> @twssmith said:
> The bane of my LSAT existence...
> Crushing every time I heard JY on his videos say that the Question was a CookieCutter Causation...
I would focus on flaw type questions and really getting good at recognizing cookiecutter type questions, this will really boost your speed and confidence
... what is wrong with the argument. I would return to the ... , you should review lawgic and argumentform lessons. Practice diagramming each answer ...