... ve never encountered these argument forms before, it seems ... NA question in an argument-by-analogy form.. again.. really weird ... question that uses a 'tautology' argumentform.
>
& ... a weird "A-->absurd" argumentform.
>
& ...
Dave killorian thinks it will be a -10 or -11. Im not sure what that’s worth but there ya go. I think a -10 is probably right. The RC and LR were challenging even with a cookiecutter LG section. Just my take- I have no expertise in this whatsoever.
Are you relying on your inution or are you solving them by looking at the logical structure of the argument (valid / invalid argumentform ) sa and na questions are more lawgic heavy
... because I want to cookiecutter every single LR question ... I should do this cookiecutter analysis for easy questions ... then individually analyze/notate/cookiecutter every single LR question ... the author advocated doing cookiecutter analysis for each question- ...
This is a valid argumentform because the existential quantifier ... all the valid and invalid argument forms and the "rules" ... , your question pertains to _Valid Form 4_)