From a logic perspective (see below) I can't work out any meaningful differences, but I noticed that JY splits these off in his map of bi-conditional statements. Am I missing something?
How would you diagram “the only thing you need for A is B ” and “the only way to have C is through D”?
Are these two the same statements?
I’m starting to feel like, at least the first one, is a bi-conditional. Thoughts?
... when I split. Work on conditional logic, it is necessary if ... ’t immediately think negate sufficient/bi-conditional, you’re doing yourself a ... classic flaws, get good at conditional logic, and work on your ...
... explanation, the stimulus is a bi-conditional relationship because of the phrase ... two **requirements**".
Therefore, the bi-conditional relationship is as follows:
Here is the best cheatsheet ever: hundreds of hours (300 hours minimum) of 7 sage (www.7sage.com). It is guaranteed! Don't trust my word, just ask the law students at the top law schools.
Here's a link to a "cheatsheet" that I and a few other students posted to before September. There is some good stuff in there..including NA/SA. Might be helpful to you all too.
http://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/5005