HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
| f | 1.5K | 2.5K |
| job | 5.2K | 7.2K |
| addendum | 1.8K | 2.7K |
-
PT71.S4.Q13/Q16/Q22If anyone is able to explain any of the above questions, I'd be very grateful. To be more specific: Q13 - stuck between A and D Q16 - was abl…
... /> Q16 - was able to eliminate C & D, but chose E ... -
PT.56.S2.Q25 - counterproductive for farmers to use insecticidesPrest Test 56 - section 2 - Q25. <font color=red>Question removed. Please see video for question:</font> http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-…
... argument's only conclusion.
C.) It is the argument's ... -
Plan B - Just in caseHello everyone, this is my first post, so go easy on me. I am assuming that everyone here wants to become an attorney, so I just wanted to pos…
... reason (e.g difficulty in job placement), what would your back ... -
PT4.S1.Q17 - crucial factor in a trialThere is actually one MSS question i can’t figure out myself: Practice Test4-Section 1-Question17. I am having trouble deciding between B and C. Can …
There is actually one MSS question i can’t figure out myself: Practice Test4-Section 1-Question17. I am having trouble deciding between B and C. Can someone help? Thanks! -
A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... it:
1. "A-->C + A -->B"
... B"
3. "A-->C + A some B"
... conclude the same "B some C" relationship. Though the first part ... is the same "A-->C", the second part is ... same conclusion for "B some C". But the problem often arises ... -
A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... it:
1. "A-->C + A -->B"
... B"
3. "A-->C + A some B"
... conclude the same "B some C" relationship. Though the first part ... is the same "A-->C", the second part is ... same conclusion for "B some C". But the problem often arises ... -
In need of dedicated study buddy (Los Angeles)I am looking for a very dedicated study buddy. I am taking the June LSAT, and I am going to work very hard to reach a 160+ score. I currently have a …
... the lsat my full time job. If you are interested in ... -
A logical reasoning question(Sorry abt the title, I forget it from which PT)..Whenever she considers voting in an election to select one candidate for a position and there is at least one issue important to her, Kay uses the fo…
... to vote for Legrand
(C) it is unacceptable for Kay ... -
LR Question- Eyewitness identification (Sorry abt the title..forget it comes from which PT..)Hi guys, sorry about the title..I did the question several days ago..so I forget it comes from which PT..As soon as I find out i will change the disc…
... statements cannot be trusted.
(C) If several eyewitnesses all identify ... -
Logic games problemDo any of you sometimes hesitate to go to the next problem when you have the same letter answer twice in a row? I sometimes loose a couple of seconds…
... and quickly looking over B,C,D and E, when I ...
