HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| chanson | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 3.3K | 4.2K |
| book | 2.9K | 3.9K |
-
Tips for CLIR strategy?Hi everyone, I really want to improve my LR score, so I am currently working through the Loophole book. I'm trying to learn how to do CLIR-ing proper…
... currently working through the Loophole book. I'm trying to learn ... -
Transition from drills to full timed sectionsI just finished fool proofing games from 1-35 and I was consistently doing most of them all right within time once I got a hang of it. I took two ful…
... fool proofing games from 1-35 and I was consistently doing ... -
Book recommendation for literature knowledgeHi everyone! I would like to hear some suggestions on books for learning (American) literature knowledge. I'm an ESL and have never learned anything …
Hi everyone! I would like to hear some suggestions on books for learning (American) literature knowledge. I'm an ESL and have never learned anything about American literature. I'm fine with RC passages that talk about literature since the pattern is quite ... -
Question about Utilizing Practice TestsHello! So I am preparing (again!) to take the February LSAT (or even delay to June) and I feel I have a fairly thorough approach. Years ago, I …
... , and Manhattan RC book. Then the LR Loophole book.
Phase ... -
Test date questionHi everyone, I have a question that I would really like some input on from fellow members on here. I started studying for the lsat in the beginning o…
... loophole, and foolproofed games 1-35. I took my first post ... for LG, I foolproofed 1-35 but still can’t seem ... -
50 days left until testing day tipsDoes anybody have suggestions on how to study for the last 50 days before test day. I've been studying 3-4 hrs a day everyday following my syllabus. …
... recommendations on a good physical book I can buy for extra ... -
PT63.S4.Q9-- Chopin and local coloristsHi, Can anyone explain to me their reasoning about how they approached the correct answer here? I thought that A (the correct answer) was wrong…
... more supported: in lines 32-35, it at least explains why ...
