... For example, the point of RC, in my view, is very different ... point of/skills involved in Supreme Court readings. RC and LR test ... school success, and success thereafter in a legal career. Maybe it ... his conclusions are questionable and, in my view, highlight a ...
... I treated it as an in/out game with subcategories ( ... M too, putting 3 players in the out group.
... because every piece can repeat in theory. With respect, I ... Thanks for sharing about the In/Out method. I will ... logic, I'd return to inCC. Also, check out the ...
... had LR-LG-LR-LR-RCin that order.
> ... to older test like those in the 50s.
> ... like q17. Similar to test in the 60s/70s. ...
>
> RC(27) Average/Hard. I generally ... struggle on all RC sections but I didn't ...
... bodies and light, two stars in distant Galaxy, whales and their ... comes down to whether people in the same format/order had ... the experiment section in different orders.
... 26)-LG-LR(experimental)-LR-RC. in this scenario, people had ...
... here--retakes are incredibly valuable! In my case, my final jump ... />
Later, as you fill in the gaps in your knowledge and improve ... to the ones in 1-35, and the RC from those exams ... and solid practice for the RCin recent exams.
... LSAC directly and use those in combination with the 7Sage PTs ... , I've found that highlighting in the digital version (both 7Sage ... responsive enough to use on RC. In fact, the _only_ time I ... not markup the stimuluses or RC sections.
... into the more challenging terms inCC! In general does any one ... ? I have done a few in 20-40, and 60-70s ... have a lesson available in the CC with a bunch of challenging ...
I think at that rate is too slow, I dont think you need to do every single problem set from the CC. I think a PT at LEAST once every 2 weeks is a must, whether your inCC or not. Honestly even one a week is fine, there are so many released practice tests.
The PT in 80s arent harder. Theyre just ... especially the case in LR. In fact I found the RCin 80s to ... and usually cause drops off in the beginning. I would especially ...
... for the fact the my RC was all over the ... place. With RC actually counting the most ( ... questions) I focused on improving inRC. In my opinion, this test rewards ... many tests you have taken in the 80's but ... a detailed BR on tests in the 80's as ...
It helped me a lot to change my mindset about RC (in addition to drilling). Instead of hating RC and dreading the sections, I told myself "Wow, I'm so excited! RC is the best!" it sounds stupid, and feels a little silly, but I saw a big difference.
... the PTs. I was in a similar boat for July ... deeper into my weakest section (RC). Lastly, trust yourself. If ... so I could focus on RCin a very deep and ... much my weakness lies entirely inRC, with both LG and ... kinda "fool-proof" all RC passages. Then I tried to ...
... is to write out the RCin my own words when I ... hella time consuming, but every RC section after I started doing ... -16 to -5 or -4 in the span of 5 PT ... write out the LR section in my own words and I ... -15 to -7 or -8 in around 6 PT's as ...
... was below average going into RC. In the third passage, my face ... 160! Going for it again in November, and I am so ... one failure under my belt. In hindsight, I realize that LR ... even after my breakdown on RC. Thank you all for your ...
... ). Depending on your goals in the LSAT, a mid- ... great place to be in order to ultimately break ... -6 on LR and RC. In other words, why did ... because of fundamental gaps in your knowledge (BR would ... br />
Same thing for RC... are you getting certain types ...
I felt like PT 88 had some brutal RC. In fact, that entire test was nonsense. It had the worst RC and the worst LG I've ever seen and both in the same test. If you're looking to destroy your self-esteem, definitely go with PT 88.