... take this to be a "causation" word? For example, if I ... "contributes" (which I thought implies causation) to "is associated with" (which ... an assumption from correlation to causation by picking it.
... strengthens correlation and not the causation. I am confused for two ... correlation, although can't prove causation, is perfectly okay to strengthen ... the causation. (I only glimpsed through the ...
... />
So Manhattan represented this in conditional logic as:
(loss ... sufficient condition. Still, with this conditional logic, I think I understand ... note, has anyone seen this conditional logic set up in other ...
... was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I ... not read it as a conditional statement. How should I have ... first sentence to see the conditional?
... mentioned is in the second conditional statement. But even then, it ... part of the explanation (last conditional statement), but why must they ...
I'm looking at PT44-S2-Q20 and the explanation for why A) and D) are wrong raised a question for me. In the explanation, it sounds to me that just because A causes B, A can happen sometimes without B happening.