... had S1LR25/S3LR25/S4LR26 Section1 WAS real not Section 3 just like ... should have known the one section I knew I destroyed was ... le sigh... here I come Feb LSAT!
... had S1LR25/S3LR25/S4LR26 Section1 WAS real not Section 3 just like ... should have known the one section I knew I destroyed was ... le sigh... here I come Feb LSAT!
... 2/3 questions on each section. For my LRs I felt ... chased by time, for one section I circled about 4 questions ... seen all of June 07, Feb97', PT A, PT B, PT ...
... when you take an LR section and try to complete them ... of recklessly complete the LR section that way. It helps to ... the tests I mentioned above? (Feb97', PT A, PT B, PT ...
> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...
@smcanete
Games in PT 1-35 are not vastly different ... , B, C, and Feb97, too. For example, PT 1 and PT 68 ... to weird-ass games from 1-35 really give you confidence ... . Definitely give 1-35 and A,B,C, Feb97 multiple attempts!
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-37-section-2-question-20/
We ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3-question-19/
We ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-21/
Choice C ...