It was supposed to help show that it is in fact circularreasoning because it's literally restating the premises except it's including both into the conclusion rather than individually.
I think the difference is that this weakens is a premise. We are supposed to interpret answer choices in strengthen/weaken as an additional premise. When the LSAT presents it as a flaw, it's the reasoning or the conclusion.
... the scope of the Critics reasoning. Yes, the Critics mention success ... the reasoning in one component (this is a strangely worded flaw question ... it describes the flaw in the Critics' reasoning. The flaw is a false ...
... />
This is similar in reasoning from the example I mentioned ... understanding, if indeed circularreasoning is about the circular support of two logically ...
... argument structure and the argument flaw 2. anticipate the answer before ... at Issue, Flaw, Parallel Reasoning, Parallel Flaw, and Method of Reasoning before doing the ...
... , what constitutes an argument flaw or error in reasoning, question types, etc ... hunting for SA questions, MBT, flaw. We grow reliant on POE ... the flaw (where's the crux of the argument, the reasoning) etc ...
Like Raptor said, it is circularreasoning. If you see something similar to this wording on the actual test - don't think about it too much. The wording is confusing but the choice itself sounds bit 'circular', which should hint at that concept to you.
... was having extreme trouble with flaw questions as well. Here is ... did. I took dozens of flaw questions. Hid their answers. And ... down reasoning structure and wrote details
On what is/are flaw ... (s) with the reasoning. After that I ...
... accurate and describes the flaw. For weakening the answer choices can ... he meant. Like for weakening answer choices that do ... flaw it did not "Weaken" the argument.
Essentially, weakening ... did high-volume of Weakening and drilling for all ...
... reason I think using counterexample reasoning to highlight the deficiency is ... the flaw as well as reasoning to an example of the flaw which ... seems like more of a reasoning stretch.