... the forum talks about drilling questions, I've been going ... go about this?
Flawquestions are a wildcard, I'll ... that one or two tough flawquestions that I can narrow down ... up the thinking on those questions, they all seem pretty attractive ...
... ?
>
> Flawquestions are a wildcard, I'll ... that one or two tough flawquestions that I can narrow ... , I would revisit those questions before doing anything else. ... keep getting these sorts of questions wrong" type. Indeed drilling ...
... see three hurdles with difficult flawquestions:
-the gap between ... see the problem of tough flawquestions. So what can we ... much time into a tough flawquestions, the worst thing we ... answer choice on flaw/descriptive weakening questions are right for ...
... types like NA and Flaw where the ACs are ... . When you read a flaw stimulus and think "oh ... time and then skipping. For flaw, this often means I ... one can "fool proof" flawquestions. I would suggest drilling and ... BRing A TON of flaw and write up detailed ...
For the easier flawquestions, try to anticipate what the flaw is. If you ... 're ever stuck on a flaw question though, just tell yourself ... I couldn't identify the flaw right away, it helps you ...
... this. I'm currently drilling Flaw. Did a few Pt's ... is good! Many of the Flawquestions are similar, and it really ... is causing X." In Weakening questions, there are (recurring) trap answer ...
Strengthen and Weaken questions require a flawed argument. A ... kind of like applied flawquestions. Without seeing the flaw, you're going ... the right one on harder questions. You've got to approach ...
... />
> Strengthen and Weaken questions require a flawed argument. A ... kind of like applied flawquestions. Without seeing the flaw, you're going ... the right one on harder questions. You've got to ... explanation of strengthen/weaken questions @"Cant Get Right" !
I think it would be worth it. 7Sage taught me the foundations of logic, which helps a ton on both types of assumption questions, as well as certain flawquestions. JY is also great at explaining the structure of flawed arguments on the LSAT.