HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| i | 168K | 727.5K |
| suck | 610 | 642 |
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
-
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> & ... gt; Can anyone confirm which LR ... expert. one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ... >
> That last LR was legit.
>
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> I had 3 LRs and didn' ... > > > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> ... gt; Can anyone confirm which LR was the expert. one? ... (My last LR section had [removed] question ... /> > > That last LR was legit.
> & ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> > I had 3 LRs and didn ... gt; > > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> ... gt; Can anyone confirm which LR was the expert. one? ... (My last LR section had [removed] question ... ; > > That last LR was legit.
> & ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > > > I had 3 LRs and didn ... > > > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> ... gt; Can anyone confirm which LR was the expert. one? ... (My last LR section had [removed] question ... ; > > That last LR was legit.
> & ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR three times and blacked out during the first LR I'm pretty sure... I thought it was considerably more difficult than previous tests.Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Beating my head off the wall while I find out the judges RC was real. Like wow what the crap was that... I had LR, LG, LR, (break), LR, RC..Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR LG LR LR RC
Praying that the second LR was real since ... it was the only one I felt ... confident about what I remember is
I blacked out on the entire ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I hope I aced LR/LG because RC is going to really make or break my score... hope I did OK at least because I know I did terrible on it..Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
> @farrellkaitie said:
> I had LR LG LR LR RC
> Praying ... that the second LR was real ... since it was the only one I felt ... remembering this wrong
I had the LR2 and LR3 ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> > I had LR LG LR LR RC
> & ... gt; Praying that the second LR ... was real since it was the only one I ... felt confident about what I remember is ...
>
> I had the LR2 and LR3 ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
> @farrellkaitie said:
> I had LR LG LR LR RC
> Praying ... that the second LR was ... real since it was the only one I felt ... remembering this wrong
I thought LR1 was hard and ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was a bit harder and I didn't get to finish ... did you think of the LR? The second one kicked my ... .
>
my first LR was a bit on the ... to spare.
I thought LR overall wasn't so bad ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Hey, so I had LR LG LR LR RC
On my 2nd LR (3rd section) I had something about clerics exaggerating how religious peasants are, and I was wondering if you can help me figure out if this was the experimental section? Thanks in advance.Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
How many different LR experimental sections are there? I don't remember ... light in space. I had LR-LG-LR-RC-LR I think? 1LR seemed ... 3rd in the middle.
I do remember questions about bikesharing ... computer skills in school but I don't know if they ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> Had 3 lr sections. Does anyone know if ... I wrote lg instead of lr haha
Bumping, also i had LR ... LG LR LR RC
The ... was in in the 2nd LR for me (the 3rd section ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> Hey, so I had LR LG LR LR RC
>
> On my 2nd LR (3rd ... section) I ... Thanks in advance.
I recognize that question. My experimental ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Does anyone know if the order is the same even for matching section orders:
Example: I had LR LG LR LR RC
is my first LR the same as someone else's first LR that had this format as well?Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC
Really hoping ... the first section of LR ... was the experimental because I found it much ... two, not entirely sure but I think the first section began ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR, LG, LR, (break), LR, RC
My first LR was legit.I screwed up ... the second LR. Does anyone ... cancel my score. I remembered my first LR had 25 questions, ... were in the third LR section but I knew the last two ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... I'll post this but anyone who had only two LR ... />
Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question ... was in the 2nd LR ... (3rd section overall). I think i bombed that ... that's why i'm desperate haha. Thanks ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> ... > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question ... was in the 2nd LR ... (3rd section overall). I think i bombed ... !!!
I had three and definitely didn ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> < ... /> > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question ... was in the 2nd LR ... (3rd section overall). I think i bombed that ... br />
2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> ... > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question ... was in the 2nd LR ... (3rd section overall). I think i bombed ... Ugh it sucks having LR as an experimental cuz it ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> & ... ; > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question ... was in the 2nd LR ... (3rd section overall). I think i bombed that ... >
> 2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ;
> Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question ... in the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think i bombed that 3rd ... was not in the real LR. I had 2 sections and do ...
>
I had 2 LR's and this was ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> & ... > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question ... was in the 2nd LR ... (3rd section overall). I think i bombed that ...
> > 2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had a question about collecting ... was easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about ... like that?
I remember the data collection/correction ... you remember which LR section it was in? I also had the ... collection/correction real? And which LR section was it in for ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
> @Socrat3s said:
> I had a question about collecting ... was easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about ... and I did not have an experimental LR.
RC, LR, LG, RC, LROfficial September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... was easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about ... ?
>
> I remember the data collection/correction ... you remember which LR section it was in? I also had the ... collection/correction real? And which LR section was it in for ...
