HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| if | 76.1K | 134.6K |
| a | 136.3K | 436.2K |
| then | 29.5K | 42.2K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| but | 76.9K | 124.7K |
| not | 65.2K | 113.9K |
| otherwise | 2K | 2.1K |
-
BiconditionalsPerhaps I missed something as I do not remember a lesson on biconditionals (double arrows). My understanding is that each term is both sufficient…
... I'm not sure about "if A, then B vice versa" and "except A, B"
... br /> So yeah, if A, then B vice versa would imply a bi-conditional relationship ... case it would be if B, then A. Which combined with the ... not add up to mean the same thing. But just for a ... -
BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
... the inverse of the statement A or B but not both like Sami described ... that is untrue/false). **We then must represent the logical necessity ... that if we have A then we cannot have B; it's a bit of a ... -
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... not the same thing. If A, then not B is represented as A----->/B ( B----->/A) and A or B, but not ... both is /A----->B ( /B ... -
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... initial thread did not state that. It said "A or B, but not both." Your ... biconditional would be the case if it ... is the same thing as "if A, then /B." I am assuming that the ... -
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... an inclusive or. The "A or B, but both both" is an exclusive ... B, **not both**" the "exclusive or" not the "inclusive or". I'm saying "If A, then not B ... " and "A or B, but not both" as separate conditions ... -
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... the exclusive arena does not mean at least one ... saying is LSAC does not tend to use the ... in "One of A or B is selected, but not both." This is ... specific in nature than "A or B, but not both." Anyways, I don ... If you'd like to discuss it in more detail, then ... -
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... more specific in nature than "A or B, but not both." Anyways, I don ... . If you'd like to discuss it in more detail, then just ... is a possibility. If we had "not both" by itself (without the "or"), then ... -
What Must be True, Could Be True, Cannot Be True - Conditional ReasoningHi! I have been working in the core curriculum for some time and there is something that I am not quite clear about conditional reasoning and its …
... is that **IF** A, **THEN** B contraposes(is that a word?) to **IF NOT** B **THEN NOT** A. I ... know this must be true.
>
> But ... what about **IF NOT** B **THEN** A? Is this a cannot be true or a could ... -
Valid vs. Invalid ArgumentsSo I think i'm confused at how these are different. I completely understand the definitions of valid and invalid arguments. I'm just confused at how …
... a cat then it is a mammal, that follows a basic structure that says: If A then B. A ... **_valid argument_** could look something like: If something is a cat then it ... are not cats) but rather by the form:
If something is an A then ... -
Timing myself during CC?BR is still slightly confusing in the sense that I'm not sure if the first time around (when I'm doing question sets) if I'm supposed to be timing my…
... , the logical reasoning section is not meant to be something people ... conditional statements such as "If A then B," "A **unless** B" "A if and only if B" You need to ... -14 correct. BUT after a few months of doing a lot of conditional ... -
Valid vs. Invalid ArgumentsSo I think i'm confused at how these are different. I completely understand the definitions of valid and invalid arguments. I'm just confused at how …
... a cat then it is a mammal, that follows a basic structure that says: If A then B. A ... **_valid argument_** could look something like: If something is a cat then it ... not cats) but rather by the form:
> If something is an A then ... -
MBT - Conditional logic Question typeHi Guys, Can you please help with this question ? Either A’s faction or B’s faction, but not both, will win control of the government. If A’s fa…
... conditionals.
Answer choice B states in lawgic NSE -> ... affirming the necessary and as a result concluding the sufficient condition ... choice D states that if NSM then maybe, but not certain that TW. It ... -
Understanding of Sufficient and Necessary Conditions + LawgicHello. I have been having some trouble with actually solidifying my understanding of the meaning of Sufficient Conditions and Necessary Conditions as…
... words. Know that "if a, then b" a is sufficient and b is necessary. Or that ... happy. a-->b-->c but if C is negated (John is not happy ... by everything else? No? Then that's not your conclusion. Your conclusion ... -
PT44.S4.Q22 - Research shows that when dogsThe question is linked below: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question-22/ I'm looking for advice because upon first read…
... /> Given a conditional statement S: if A then B, the logically equivalent statement is if not B then not A. That ... of (S) is if not A then not B. "mistaken negation"
But note that the ... -
LR missing things help!Hey guys, I need some assistance with my logical reasoning improvement? So yeah- basically what occurs is: I do the exam, Blind review, then I …
... answer choice is so accurate, but rather that I don't ... properly i.e. if A then B unless C or If and only If (anyone want ... answers wrong even during BR but what matters more than your ... on identifying why you're not identifying the structure properly. It ... -
PT36.S1.Q22 - Any writer whose purpose is personal expression<font color="red">Admin note: Deleted. Please don't post the actual question</font> Translated: Poet --> Purpose PE <s> Ambig. Words Thus. …
... ; @"hosny.yhm" you're not wrong, but the reason the answer is ... a sufficient assumption question and not a necessary assumption.
Thank you. But ... telling me that if I see "A" sometimes "B", it means If "A" then "B" in Sufficient ... -
PT36.S1.Q22 - Any writer whose purpose is personal expression<font color="red">Admin note: Deleted. Please don't post the actual question</font> Translated: Poet --> Purpose PE <s> Ambig. Words Thus. …
... ; @"hosny.yhm" you're not wrong, but the reason the answer is ... and not a necessary assumption.
>
> Thank you. But, I ... telling me that if I see "A" sometimes "B", it means If "A" then "B" in Sufficient ... -
PT36.S1.Q22 - Any writer whose purpose is personal expression<font color="red">Admin note: Deleted. Please don't post the actual question</font> Translated: Poet --> Purpose PE <s> Ambig. Words Thus. …
... ; @"hosny.yhm" you're not wrong, but the reason the answer is ... not a necessary assumption.
> >
> > Thank you. But ... telling me that if I see "A" sometimes "B", it means If "A" then "B" in Sufficient ... -
PT87.S2.Q26 - People should patronize businessesHey, if anyone has taken this PT yet, can someone explain why the right answer is the right one? I was able to eliminate the 4 wrong AC's during m…
... out is use of similar but clearly different terms. “Meeting ... high ethical standard THEN media should support"
(If A then B)
a notable ethical action does not qualify as ... standards." since it's not the same thing, we ... -
Unmentioned possibility in bi-conditional stimulusIn the lesson on bi-conditionals (Lesson 7 of 18 in Advanced Logic), we are told that "Alan attends the meeting only if Chris attends the meeting" is…
... :
A → C :: If A then C
>But don't we ... need another expression that says in effect, "otherwise ... /> /C → /A :: If not C ("otherwise") then not A.
A bi-conditional would be A _if and ... -
Conditional statementI have a random question LMAO! If in a grouping logic game the rule is: if W then T or F does that mean that if I have T or F in the yes/in group, …
... they will say “A or B but not both”. If they don’t say ... or both without W. As a conditional, W is _sufficient_ ... ”, but it’s not _necessary_.
“If I (take a Kaplan course) then ... sufficient for the improvement, but it’s not necessary. After all, ... -
LR missing things help!Hey guys, I need some assistance with my logical reasoning improvement? So yeah- basically what occurs is: I do the exam, Blind review, then I …
... do the exam, Blind review, then I still miss -4--6 ... answer choice is so accurate, but rather that I don't ... properly i.e. if A then B unless C or If and only If (anyone want ... to point out a good ... -
Help#Questions about match the flaw questionsI saw this on some LSAT prep book: Question: for example in a mistake necessary as sufficient question, Premise: If A then B. Conclusion: B the…
... sufficient question,
Premise: If A then B.
Conclusion: B therefore A.
Given ... /> 1) If A then B, and if B then C.
C, therefore A.
2) if A then B, not A, therefore notcklomoooooo-1 October 2021 Logical Reasoning
-
Inference MBTI hate these questions, they truly are the bane of my existence, and study. I am not sure what I am missing, but I am just not accurate with these qu…
... + target scorers there is not enough time to conditionally map ... pretty simple, such as If A, then B, we have an A, etc.
... if you're well versed in conditional lawgic, should not take ... more than a few seconds. -
game simple question!Hi, I'm a bit confused with the rule "M and N cannot be selected together." Is this a biconditional with never together always apart? so, M <--> ~…
... />
Some examples of what a bi-conditional rule would look ... :
- "M is in if and only if N is in" M ... /> - "N is in if M is in, but not otherwise" M N, ~M ~N ... M or N is in, but not both" M ~N
BiconditionalsPerhaps I missed something as I do not remember a lesson on biconditionals (double arrows). My understanding is that each term is both sufficient…
I'm not sure about "if A, then B vice versa" and "except A, B"
@Sami
What are your thoughts?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... /> A B
A B
The last possibility (A B) is **not** allowed. Why? Well if ... /> A or B but not both https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=A+or+B+but+not+bothis that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... not.
Even if this is true, it's not ... when you simply state, "A or B, but not both" (The LSAT does ... (that "must" is a necessary part of that statement ... LSAT. Now, I'm not a logician, so I don't ... this is the case, but it's an interesting point ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... not.
>
> Even if this is true, it's not ... "A is true"?
So "A or B, but not both" = "A is true or B ... is true, but not both". There ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... /> If you look at the truth tables for "A or B" and for "A ... or B, but not both" the possibility ... of having NONE of A or B is not ...