HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| lg | 16.7K | 27.6K |
| rc | 18K | 31.1K |
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
-
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... for the experimental RC section. My test was RC-LR-LG-RC-LR and my first ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> I had RC LR LG RC LR. Was really hoping that the ... first RC was real, but turns out ... passage were ridiculous. LG was pretty easy and LR was par for ... , though doubtful considering June's RC was brutal, as well.
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... taker, my test order is LG RC LR RC LR, have 2 RCs. Remember that ... the first RC have the last passage of ... international law. For the 2nd RC, have the AB passage of ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... taker, my test order is LG RC LR RC LR, have 2 RCs. Remember that ... the first RC have the last passage of ... international law. For the 2nd RC, have the AB passage of ... you.
The 2nd RC is the real one according ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 166-169. I had RC LR LG RC LR The test was hard enough ... only one). The experimental RC was the second round of ... test. I finished both LR sections right before the 5 ... On the food/QG rule LG game, I started diagramming ... pace for the real RC. I believe this was ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Hi everyone. I had LG-LR-LG--RC-LR. The only thing I remember ... from the second LG (third section overall) was that ... who did not have two LG sections confirm that they DID ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > Hi everyone. I had LG-LR-LG--RC-LR. The only thing I remember ... from the second LG (third section overall) was that ... who did not have two LG sections confirm that they DID ... one. I only had 1 LG section.Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> > Had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. Any idea what the question ... the same question distribution for LR. Thought I might have ... /> >
Mine was a RC, LR, LG, RC, LR.
I'm pretty sure ... real sections are LR 25, LR, 26, LG 23, and RC 27 for a ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... easy (I had LR LG LR LR RC). I think the LR section talking about Shakespeare ... did not have an experimental LR.
RC, LR, LG, RC, LROfficial September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 166-169. I had RC LR LG RC LR The test was hard enough ... only one). The experimental RC was the second round of ... test. I finished both LR sections right before the 5 ... On the food/QG rule LG game, I started diagramming ... pace for the real RC. I believe this was ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... />
LG (exp) - LR - LG - RC - LR
RC (exp) - LR - LG - RC - LR
LR - LG - LR - LG - RC (unsure of exp ... )
LG: XX ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> I had RC LR LG RC LR. Was really hoping that the ... passage were ridiculous. LG was pretty easy and LR was par for ... , though doubtful considering June's RC was brutal, as well. < ... I had a different experimental RC than people have been talking ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... for the experimental RC section. My test was RC-LR-LG-RC-LR and my first ... about pyramids from the 1st RC. Maybe I blocked it out ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
I had 2 LG - RC, LR, LG, LG, LR. I fucked up the first LG. the 1st and ... [removed].
Is this LG an experimental one?Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
Anyone have RC-LR-LG RC-LR?
I'm curious to ... with the second section (first LR). I don't quite remember ... .
I found that LR section particularly difficult and much ... harder than the second LR section. Anyone agree?Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... 2 RC as well... RC, LR, LG, RC, LR
If the Real RC was the ... I messed up the first RC section.Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... /> > I had 2 RC as well... RC, LR, LG, RC, LR
>
& ... gt; If the Real RC was the ... I messed up the first RC section.
Had ... or something. My experimental RC was the fourth section.Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... well! Although the first RC section was somewhat easy I ... is apparently real. My second RC had the ballet dancer, ... /> > I had 2 RC as well... RC, LR, LG, RC, LR
>
& ... gt; If the Real RC was ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... well! Although the first RC section was somewhat easy I ... is apparently real. My second RC had the ballet dancer, ... ; > I had 2 RC as well... RC, LR, LG, RC, LR
> > < ... br /> > > If the Real RC was ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... ! Although the first RC section was somewhat easy ... apparently real. My second RC had the ballet dancer ... > I had 2 RC as well... RC, LR, LG, RC, LR
> > ... > If the Real RC was the Chinese-Am language ... I messed up the first RC section.
> ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... well! Although the first RC section was somewhat easy I ... is apparently real. My second RC had the ballet dancer, ... ; > I had 2 RC as well... RC, LR, LG, RC, LR
> > < ... br /> > > If the Real RC was ...February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
I had LG LR LG RC LR. The Powerscore link posted above by @KevinA14 is spot on. The second LG on my test (Section 3) was experimental.February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... /> > Was the string quartet LG real? Something like picking 2 ... /> Did you have this order: LG, LR, LG, RC, LR
Because that was ... in the 1st or 3rd LG section? Because the string quartet ...February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
LG with truck on east west north south, is it real? It was the Section 3. The second LG for me.
I had LG LR LG RC LR.
RC had DuBois and Washington, Copyright, Beetle, Justified lying (not in order).February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... ; > Was the string quartet LG real? Something like picking 2 ... ; Did you have this order: LG, LR, LG, RC, LR
>
> Because ... in the 1st or 3rd LG section? Because the string quartet ... in the 3rd section. 1st LG section was real.February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... ; > Was the string quartet LG real? Something like picking 2 ... ; Did you have this order: LG, LR, LG, RC, LR
>
> Because ... in the 1st or 3rd LG section? Because the string quartet ...February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... the following LR is experimental? I had LR Lg Lr lr RC. The first LR had (ivy ... />
I had LG LR LG RC LR
The 1st LR was definitely real ...February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... /> > There was also a LR question about forging an authors ... though
I had LG LR LG RC LR
I remember a ...February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... ; > There was also a LR question about forging an authors ... /> >
> I had LG LR LG RC LR
>
> I ...February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... :
> I had 3 LR -- "It was all a dream ... candidates???
I had LG LR LG RC LR
The disagree question ...
