HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| logical | 3K | 3.9K |
| indicator | 854 | 1.1K |
| will | 42.9K | 65.7K |
| not | 65.4K | 114.3K |
-
Logical IndicatorOn the conditional indicator drill made by the student, the logical indicator "will" appear and the rule say's it indicates a necessary term. "Wi…
... made by the student, the logical indicator "will" appear and the rule say ... necessary term.
"Will" however, is not on the "4 Translation ... "will" is now tripping me up and I do not know ... it in my Group 2 Logical Indicator or not. Please help! :) -
Does the condition ALWAYS follow the logical indicator?I feel like soon as I can cement this I will be good! I'm challenged to properly identify whether one can pronounce 'X' or 'Y' of a given statement a…
... I can cement this I will be good! I'm challenged ... certain condition BECAUSE the logical indicator preceded it or not. Are there circumstances ... rules for when it does not? I keep getting caught in ... is before and after the logical indicator. And yes, I have ... -
"It is" as a logical indicatorI just finished a PT that made use twice of "it is," in english to convey logic, in one SA question. This indicator is not in the CC and honestly, th…
... one SA question. This indicator is not in the CC and honestly ... is" is a group TWO indicator.** This might be intuitive for ... people but it definitely was not for me. My uncertainty was ... will not be thrown off if you happen to come across this indicator ... -
Logical Indicator WordsCan anyone quickly tell me if "for" is a logical indicator word?
Can anyone quickly tell me if "for" is a logical indicator word? -
PT40.S3.Q25 - inflation rates will not stabilizehttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-25/ Hoping someone can explain why the answer is D. I understand why A, B and E ar…
... the level of vehicle safety will not be optimal." In other words ... , "Vehicle Safety WILL NOT (absolute) be optimal." Our stimulus ... to claim that D did not make an absolute claim. I ... -
logical indicator "or"Can someone please share an example of using the logical indicator "or" from the negate sufficient group? Thanks!
Can someone please share an example of using the logical indicator "or" from the negate sufficient group? Thanks! -
logical indicator 'until'hey! the logical indicator 'until' in this ex/ mary goes to the gym until brittany goes to the gym - M ->B -B -> M would this be the corre…
hey!
the logical indicator 'until'
in this ex/ ... -
PT69.S2.Q15 - How to interpret "except" as a logical indicator in this context?Hi, Could someone please help me with interpreting "except" in this sentence? In order to encourage personal responsibility in adults, societ…
... responsibility in adults, society should not restrict the performance of any ... on others". I understand this logical transition. However, in the syllabus ... "except" is a bi-conditional indicator? So, will we use "except" as ... -
To Lawgic or not to LawgicThat is the question. I have found that JY will sometimes ignore logical indicator language in a stimulus (always, the only, unless, etc...) for no r…
... have found that JY will sometimes ignore logical indicator language in a stimulus ... ...) for no reason whatsoever and not really explain why he chose ... -
"Until" as a logical indicatorHi all, I'm not through the CC yet (obviously). When learning logical indicators, I'm trying to reason my way through them, because I know I will fo…
... , I'm not through the CC yet (obviously). When learning logical indicators ... them, because I know I will forget rote memorization. I understand ... -
Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... having trouble with. I will not really be discussing any ... br /> Note: there are other indicator words, but these are the ... there are only three logical options for what change ... some examples of representation in logical reasoning problems
PT41.S1.Q09 - technological improvements will enable foodhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-09/ Hi, while solving MSS questions, I often confront the situation in which whether I…
... the passage states "technological improvements will enable food production to increase ... statement "increases in food production will be negligible unless societies become ... /> Perhaps this type of logical translation might not be appropriate for this ...RC Annotation Method and BR (Most Authoritarian Rulers Passage pt.2)Hey guys after watching Nicole Hopkins' webinar on RC Methods and Jimmy Quicksilver's webinar on RC Question Types and Tips I thought it would be hel…
... didn’t see the logical indicator or interpreted it the ... that authoritarian regimes are not SUSTAINABLE however they are ... br /> Why you would accidentally NOT choose this:
• This ... as “many authoritarian rulers will eventually institute democratic reforms” ...Logical NegationI'm starting to confuse myself. Can someone clarify how they would do a logical negation of this for the NA Negation Technique? "Any candidate wh…
... how they would do a logical negation of this for ... many positive feelings in votes will not be elected."
----< ... evoke positive feelings in votes will be elected.
... image does not evoke many positive feelings in votes will not be ...PT2.S4.Q12 - though they soon will, patients should notThis is a really unusual question and took a long time to come up with this reasoning. Any feedback on my reasoning would be appreciated. Context:…
...
Reason 1: it will significantly reduce the amount of ... doesn’t matter. They will not be time spent on that ... answer choice that will make reason 2 not cancel out ... still not a good reason if no one will ask ... handle the records, it will not be a waste of ...Kaplan vs 7sage logical indicators approachI started this LSAT journey with a quick pass through of the Kaplan logical reasoning approach and, honestly, there were still some pretty gaping hol…
... pass through of the Kaplan logical reasoning approach and, honestly, ... holes in my comfort with logical reasoning translation. At first, ... realizing that it's just not intuitive for me to ... to treat UNLESS as a logical indicator for the necessary term. Then ...Negating using "not"Can anyone help me with this negation? The sentence is: “The highest point of any volcanic ash cloud will eventually exceed an altitude of 5 km” …
... of any volcanic ash cloud will not eventually exceed an altitude of ... lesson) was to say the logical opposite of something. But now ... I am wondering if the logical opposite means the thing you ... highest point of not any volcanic ash cloud will eventually exceed an ...I have an odd Logical Indicator questionHi all! In the phrase "It is the national government that must save the environment" Why is it that "save the environment" is not the necessary…
... that "save the environment" is not the necessary condition?
and ... ; national government" is the correct logical translation to this sentence ??
Two Logical IndicatorsQuestion: in the sentence, "If you’re not greedy, you’re not a business school student" the two different conditional indicators confuse me: if I use…
... If you’re not greedy, you’re not a business school ... however, if I use "not," then I can come ... and also has the SC indicator "If"). So, which ... correct, but I'm not sure why.
Is ... " overpowers "not", and "not" is merely a negation and not a logical indicator?[Updated] Free BR Call for PT76 Logical Reasoning (Session 4) Friday, December 18th, 6PM ESTHi everyone! I am excited to say that I will be leading BR Calls for PT76 with the next session on Friday, December 18th at 6PM EST We will be…
... and more. Hopefully there will be something useful for everyone ... due to LSAC policy, I will not be able to share my ... I encourage participation and will be asking for volunteers both ...
Next Session: PT76 Logical Reasoning (Session 4)
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
... LSAT question?
Not silly :) Great question!
will stop walking with crutches once ...Lesson 28 of 40 Introduction to logic , @ 2 minutes 28 sec to 2 minutes 34 secWhen JY is explaining not ( group 4 Logical operator) he does not apply the not to the come home idea. i understand its function as a logical operato…
... "until" as the group 3 indicator and "not" as the negation of ... video he uses "not" as the group 4 indicator and "until" as ... just showing that either approach will lead you to the same ... use "until" as the logical indicator and use "not" as the negation, since ...translating a complex-conditional into lawgic"Without strength or endurance, the fight is all but lost." This is #5 on the quiz on complex conditional translations to lawgic. We are to tra…
... only logical indicator (depending on whether one wishes to use "not" as ... two about which the LSAT will test your understanding.
... or endurance, the fight is not lost", you should be ... "Without" introduces is what will become your (after being negated ...Translating sentences into lawgicThis question is taken from the Group 1 Group 2 Translation exercise but I'm finding recurring instances of odd translations into conditional lawgic.…
... whether "always" is really a logical indicator, at least for Group 2 ... mechanical translation of logic/lawgic will give you the correct ... times when the rule may not hold.
For ... the necessary condition? I hope not.
So, overall ...Group 3 Logical Indicators problemsJust started Group 3 Logical Indicators, and I'm confused. I'm not confused about the process (or at least I don't think I am). With Group 3 Indicato…
... />
Honestly, I am not sure how to articulate to ... just seeing examples will help you. I will think about it ... to get something out of logical chains. They're there ... would be to not just put the logical indicator back into the ... of the original indicator.Improving my blind review methods?I am trying to keep a positive hardworking attitude towards the LSAT, but this has been increasingly more difficult when my recent 4 PT scores after …
... discouraged about one test. It will happen. Double back with even ... m not sure what exactly you mean by "dive deep." I will ... each answer is correct or not. Forcing yourself to literally write ... to go back and drill logical indicator groups more? Have you memorized ...Improving my blind review methods?I am trying to keep a positive hardworking attitude towards the LSAT, but this has been increasingly more difficult when my recent 4 PT scores after …
... discouraged about one test. It will happen. Double back with ... m not sure what exactly you mean by "dive deep." I will ... to go back and drill logical indicator groups more? Have you memorized ... this awesome. Thank you! I will start practicing writing out tough ...Best Strategy Going Forward...Hi guys, I am incredibly happy to have found this. I just want some advice. I have pushed off my LSAT 2x and rescheduled w/out actually taking it. Th…
... , it takes forever. This is not a test you can rush ... your goals for improvement are not drastic.
Without knowing ... in the "analytics" section. It will show you how many you ... ? Do you know the different logical indicator words? Do you know how ...PT73.4.19 and PT34.2.2 (please help)Hi guys, I am having trouble understanding JY's reasoning behind choosing correct answers in the above problems. PT73.4.19 is a necessary assump…
... buy milk. --- IF is our logical indicator here. It introduces the sufficient ... is not one of our logical indicators and therefore it does not note ... that better futures are possible will NOT help prevent the loss of ...PT73.4.19 and PT34.2.2 (please help)Hi guys, I am having trouble understanding JY's reasoning behind choosing correct answers in the above problems. PT73.4.19 is a necessary assump…
... "do" appears after the logical indicators like always and must ... > In PT 34, the indicator was always, and in PT ... . I understand "do" alone is not a logical indicator.
>
& ... added.
I will respond in more depth when ...
